240V | and half at 120V (using a centre tap) | A two pole breaker is then needed. | In my house, I have 1-2pole 30A 240A breaker for the dryer, 1-2pole 40A | 240V breaker for a stove (not in use as my present stove is gas) and 18 | single pole breakers 15A breakers for 120V circuits. 3 of these are ganged | as 2 pole because kitchen duplex outlets must have the two outlets on | different circuits to eliminate the nuisance involved in running a 1200W | toaster and a 1500Watt kettle on the same circuit at the same time. | The panel has room for more breakers, if needed and has a 2 pole 200A main | breaker. | That's a recipe for disaster, it leaves it to the electrician to wire the house for a balance load and requires half voltage, double current appliances as well as three supply wires. When I wired my daughter's kitchen I put in 23 cascaded sockets, wired with 2.5 mm copper conductor, both ends of the cascade connected to a 30 amp breaker. We call it a ring main. Each appliance gets up to a 13 amp fused plug.
formatting link
The kettle alone is 3 kW.
formatting link
One socket was on a spur going outside for the electric lawn mower. Ten sockets were for her computer and peripherals. Another ring main for the living room and utility room and another for all the upstairs bedrooms. The shower is on a separate circuit, that's 10 kW and the IEEE regulations for bathrooms is strict.
Everything you've said looks like a disadvantage to me, I asked what the advantage was. :-)
------------------------------ You can't wire for a balanced load so the best you can do is put half the
15A circuits on one leg and half on the other leg (phase to you). Each of these circuits will need 2 wires, live and neutral although in recent years the code requires a 3rd "ground" wire of smaller gauge which does not normally carry current. Panel construction interleaves the legs so that 2 adjacent breakers are on different legs so there is really no big choice to be made by the electrician (it also facilitates the use of 2 pole breakers). This is similar to UK usage except that the ground and neutral are tied together at the main panel (and to ground there). Only in the case of kitchen duplex outlets will there be 2 hot wires- other duplex outlets have only one hot wire.
120V appliances are limited to 15A- vs 7.5A for the corresponding 240V appliance. Certainly a UK kettle at 3KW will heat up a lot faster than a US kettle at 1.5KW so there is a disadvantage. However the appliances requiring 3KW will be designed for and fed 240V and typically will be on a dedicated circuit so it isn't a big deal. Definitely not a cause for disaster.
The ring main approach requires fused appliance outlets. The North American system is radial- each 15A circuit may have several outlets on the same circuit- the disadvantage is that if the breaker is tripped, all the outlets on that circuit are dead. On the other hand, wiring and outlets are simpler- no fuses on outlets and generally no switches on them. I have an outside circuit on on a GFI breaker and any outlets in bathrooms are also on GFI
Why the UK went one way and North America another way is something that is conjecture. Possibly the Edison DC system set the direction in North America. The problem is that once a region goes down a given path, it is very difficult to make a radical change (and it would be radical). Safety-no big advantage one way or the other- as an old prof of mine (from the UK) said 'you can make something fool proof but you can't make it damn-fool proof".
Yes there are advantages to the UK system but there are cost advantages to the American system- on average less copper and simpler outlets and plugs. The trade off is often in the mind of the user -what he is used to dealing with is best.
Don Kelly cross out to reply