Re: Through Hole vs. Surface Mount

Mar 29, 2010 1 Replies


SMD is a lot less difficult than it looks. The space savings and the


> option to mount components on both sides of the board are a nice bonus
> in addition to the drilling.
> --
> RoRo

What about circuits that use a PIC that needs to be programmed where the PIC can not be programmed in place? I was all set to use surface mount on a project and then started thinking about how many holes I would still have to drill. It seemed like I would still have to drill about half of the connections.


Dan



I would try VERY hard to avoid that. I can't imagine a situation where it should be particularly difficult to implement ICSP.

Worst case, put the PIC in a socket and the rest of the parts on the surface.

Yes, most SMD projects do need some holes.

Well, you reduced the number of holes by half. As a bonus, you reduced size, weight and cost. A pretty good deal, if you ask me.

Usually, you can't eliminate all the holes, but reducing the count is a good thing, especially if you are hand drilling.

RoRo

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required