Re: OT: Webb shows dark matter theory as false?

Nov 13, 2024 Last reply: 1 year ago 3 Replies


Astronomers' theory of how galaxies formed may be upended


> New research questions standard model
>
formatting link
Source:
> Case Western Reserve University
> Summary:
> The standard model for how galaxies formed in the early universe predicted
> that the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) would see dim signals from small,
> primitive galaxies.
> But data are not confirming the popular hypothesis that invisible dark matter
> helped the earliest stars and galaxies clump together.

The CDM theory still isn't beaten yet. Although MOND might appear superficially better on these selected data there is an element of cherry picking going on.


It remains to be seen if fainter galaxies even further back are more as CDM predicts. This stuff is right at the limits of detection for the WST so it wouldn't surprise me if the brightest stuff is quite obvious and more common than was expected whilst the faintest smaller objects though more numerous are much harder to see.


Several new faint objects in the deep Hubble field have been missed until very recently. There is a nasty and complex sampling interaction between Lyman alpha emission being redshifted to a wavelength we can detect which makes seeing things at this sort of redshift rather tricky.


formatting link
I expect the same issue will affect WST in almost the same way.

This s called the "ether theory" and is as dead as the Le sage theory of gravity.

Sadly, you can't think in any useful way.

Black holes can't "spit out matter". Hawking showed that they have to be able to evaporate matter - but very slowly.

Your logic is defective.

A medium that doesn't seem to exist.

Since you don't understand Einstein's equations, your opinion on their validity isn't all that interesting.

That is a matter of opinion. When you think that the the Le Sage Theory of gravity is worth wasting bandwidth on, your own grasp of reality is debatable.

A bizarre assertion. I was quick to find a couple of faults in Edward Rawdes low distortion 1kHz oscillator. My design skills don't get tested here - I am trying to get my own version the FET based 1kHz oscillator to work, but it is simulating remarkably slowly at the moment (about

10usec/sec). Something is messing it up - probably the full wave rectifier that depends on an LT1360, and it seems to injecting low level 160kHz hash into the system

The AD734 version I simulated a few years ago is tidier, but the AD734 is remarkably expensive. The LT1360 behaved rather better in that simulation, but maybe they've changed the Spice model since then.

I just read the popular astronomy stuff that gets in to New Scientist. The field is very far from dead

Of course outer space is not empty - even in the emptiest areas there are a still a few hydrogen atoms per cubic centimetre.

formatting link

I have another PC on remote desktop for overnight simulation but I still wouldn't run 10us/s If you find any more faults in my circuit please let me know. If you can explain what the dc-trim circuit is actually doing please let me know.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required