Re: OT - Archie - I Dare You

My favorite employment test (I used it in the late '70's)....

+Vcc o | .--------+ | | | | \\ R | / | \\ | | | +----. | | | | c | c b---+--b NPN transistors e e | |
Reply to
Jim Thompson
Loading thread data ...

m)

That

Vcc/2 V. Vcc/2 mA.

Also assuming Vbe1(I)=3DVbe2(I)=3DVbe3(I)

Reply to
keithw86

Well, you didn't mention anything about oscillations.

I did like the "about" bits, which indicate that you're willing to make reasonable assumptions and get on with things.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

I was going to answer, but didn't want to spoil it. The difference is that I was going to say, "About 4.4V" and "About4.4 mA". ;-)

Other comments? Sure - where's the load? ;-)

Cheers! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

I don't see any reactive elements. ;-)

It's also a good escape clause. ;-)

Reply to
krw

I have been here for years, you pathetic idiot. He is the invader, as are you.

Hardly. He is hard wired old and stupid. He will never advance mentally past the age of 13. You are a worse case. You actually think your behavior was honorable and that you deserve respect from me. You do not. You are pathetic. You should hang yourself as soon as you can possibly do so, before the exposure level climbs too high.

He has never said anything nice to me... ANYWHERE. He always gets a plate of shit fed to him by me. YOU are a 100% similar case, dumbfuck. Except that you have the distinct attribute of being a confessed war criminal.

Hardly. His 13 year old mentality stupidity is only paled by you thinking and declaring that you gave service honorably, while admitting to being a war criminal out of the side of your mouth.

You really are funny. Do you always call folks you know absolutely nothing about "flunkie"? After behavior like that I described above, you qualify better as a flunkie than I, since you cannot grasp the depth of criminality of your actions in service.

Remember this, Choward, you pathetic piece of shit. You took an oath. If I saw you mutilating an enemy's body on my watch, I would put a .45 in your skull right on the spot. Court martial is over, you were found guilty. That dumb shit is lower than the enemy is, and since you cannot grasp that fact, there is no hope for you.

Reply to
TheGlimmerMan

Fuck off retard. Go spend your net search time looking up things about military conduct, dumbass. That is where you failed miserably.

Reply to
TheGlimmerMan

Sure they do. My service was before they changed to the shit they are using now. The .45 was my sidearm. You would have eaten one round.

Reply to
TheGlimmerMan

On Jun 13, 1:43=A0pm, TheGlimmerMan wrote:

***glimmerman Drivel Excluded***

I had to ask around and read a bit to understand what choward was about and I now understand what is being referred to. The one known as glimmerman, archimedes lever, and so many other personalities is attempting to denigrate choward for dishonorable and illegal acts that he (choward) supposedly committed during his military service (branch unstated). It seems that glimmerman is one of the noble types of warriors who greatly respect their enemy and bestow all kinds of status upon them because they are in a combative situation. It is highly questionable whether the glimmerman ever was actually in a war zone, hence, his comments regarding respectful treatment of one's enemy is highly suspect. An example may be drawn from the Vietnam era wherein the few documented instances of United States troops' improper conduct was heavily covered by the world media and the similar, daily conduct by the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese was hardly ever made a fuss over. It was not until the latter began to be treated in a like manner by the US ground forces that they finally scaled down (but never totally eliminated) the atrocities. One of their primary assumptions was to make engaging them so horriffic to the US soldiers that it would demoralize them and make them easier prey. While there are those who claim that this sometimes worked for them, there was also the occasional backlash like My Lai that was extremely counterproductive from their perspective. In the current exchange between choward and the multiple personalities presented by Lever, choward is counting on his real world experience to win over Lever's attacks on his honor, grammar, use of vulgarity and all of the things that Lever has been using that date back to 2007. It is my opinion that Lever is not able to support his position as well as one would think when one considers it to be a good (Lever) vs evil (choward) exchange. The critical question is who would you want to protect you

- Lever or Choward. I see only downside to Lever. I expect Lever to let the profanity flow in response, so I say "f*ck off" to him first.

Reply to
Orville

snipped retarded monologue by the monologue retard.

You're an idiot. Choward admitted to his crime, and is dishonored by his own actions, both what he did when he did it, and now, by admitting it so late. Having done so in a public forum is just icing on the cake.

You are nothing more than a pathetic troll, so you really deserve no further attention.

Reply to
TheGlimmerMan

They're there. Emitter followers with stiff base drive often oscillate.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

You obviously know nothing about Usenet. You should refrain from further posting until you learn what the word CITE means with respect to Usenet posting conventions and protocols.

You should LEAVE until you learn about the forum you have chosen to invade.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Oh this is fun. You're Glimmerman too. And this guy says that you said you're a celibate individual? Cite nothing, what did you mean when you said it - that's the only question you need to be concerned with now.

Reply to
Alicia

If you take a look, some of his 46 known nyms are females, of sorts. Almost all of them are childish, or like someone with a sub 70 IQ. that's why we call him 'dimbulb' & 'Always Wrong'. The ignorant little bitch thinks that a constant stream of new nyms will get him past kill filters, but his ignorance shines through, within a few words. He can't post without his five favorite words. A head shrinker could make a life long case study of this twisted little loser.

Abbey Somebody AnimalMagic Archimedes' Lever Bart! Bungalow Bill

Capt. Cave Man ChairmanOfTheBored Corbomite Carrie DarkMatter Do I really need to say?

Dorothy with the Red Shoes on Dr. Heywood R. Floyd FatBytestard FunkyPunk FieldEffectTrollsistor FunkyPunk FieldEffectTrollsistor

GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement

Hattori Hanzo Herbert John \\Jackie\\" Gleason" HiggsField IAmTheSlime

ItsASecretDummy LargeMarge MadManMoon MakeNoAttemptToAdjustYourSet snipped-for-privacy@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org

Mr.Eko Mr. Haney Mycelium Neanderthal Phat Bytestard

RoyLFuchs SkyPilot SoothSayer Spurious Response StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Sum Ting Wong

SuspendedInGaffa The Great Attractor

TheGlimmerMan TheKraken

The Last Mimsy TheQuickBrownFox " snipped-for-privacy@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org"

UltimatePatriot UpGrade

ValleyGirl

--
You can\'t have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

You're an idiot that doesn't have any working parts any more.

Dumbass. Only RETIRED military gets to use them (commissary) after service, dipshit, so my RETIRED service friend used to take me grocery shopping with him. When I mentioned it, it wasn't bragging either, you retarded twit.

You are pathetic, Terrell. You are a true asswipe. If you had any brains, you would stop mouthing off about something you obviously know nothing about.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

It would also be illegal, you retarded f*ck.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

The military has no interest in me, you retarded f*ck.

Some miscreant military servicemen that made some very bad choices might want to hide their crimes by capping my ability to call then dishonorable asswipes, but they really do not speak for "the military", and neither do you, idiot.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

He deserves no thanks if he mutilated the corpses of the enemy.

It is a military crime, and it puts our soldiers further into harm's way.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

You're an idiot, Terrell. This post proves that.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

On Jun 14, 11:28=A0pm, "Michael A. Terrell"

[....]
d
[....]

I suspect that fear and shame are the emotions that define him.

He also claims to work on some sort of high tech thing for the military. It could be that he does live in southern California and work in one of the many companies that makes things for the military. Perhaps:

formatting link

He has implied but, as far as I can remember, never claimed that he designs stuff. I would look for him in the testing and compliance department

[...]

d.cox.net.

73-RDC
5

ast

g
Reply to
MooseFET

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.