Spehro Pefhany wrote:
>> >>>> snipped-for-privacy@DreamPC2006.com says...
>>>>
>>>> > So the question is:
>>>> >
>>>> > Is it safer to remove lightning rods from lower buildings so the
>>>> > higher building catches the lightning ?!?
>>>> >
>>>> > Perhaps this is done so that the lightning does not split into my
>>>> > window which is near the lightning rod... if I happen to be standing
>>>> > there.
>>>> >
>>>> > Or perhaps now it will I don?t know...
>>>> >
>>>> > Perhaps it's also in some kind of guide line or law how to apply
>>>> > lightning rods...
>>>> >
>>>> > Make me think a little bit of "empire state building in new york"...
>>>> > it probably catches the most lightning if not all ?!?
>>>> >
>>>> > Bye,
>>>> > Skybuck.
>>>>
>>>> Lightning protection can be a very complex field but a widely used rule
>>>> of thumb is to take an imaginary sphere, 30 meters in diameter, and roll
>>>> it all over the landscape, anything it can touch is at risk of being hit
>>>> and should be protected.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>
>>>Correction, 30m RADIUS, sorry
>>
>> Too late, the cat's dead.
>
>Of course it's dead! Nobody's fed or watered the damn thing in 75 years!
>
>;-)
>Rich
Erwin Schrödinger's driving down the road when a cop pulls him over. The cop walks up and says, "Sir, could I take a look in your trunk?" Schrödinger acquiesces and opens the trunk. The cop goes, looks inside, and comes back. "Sir," he says, "did you know you have a dead hooker in your trunk?"
Schrödinger replies, "Well, I do now!"
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany