Re: Judge says parents should start parenting

"Judge restores Americans' right to online smut"

>
formatting link
> > "District Judge Lowell Reed has permanently blocked prosecutors > from enforcing the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), > saying it violates Americans' first-amendment right > to freedom of expression." > > This case came back to life in Jan 2006 > when Alberto Gonzales told Google, MSN, Yahoo, and AOL > to turn over millions of search records. > (Only Google told them to piss off.) > > The judge said to install filters on your own kid's computers.

___________________________________________

ASK DR. RUWART

Dr. Mary Ruwart is a leading expert in libertarian communication. In this column she offers short answers to real questions about libertarianism. To submit questions to Dr. Ruwart, see end of column.

  • * *

How would a free society handle the problem of pornography?

Question: How would a libertarian society deal with the problem of unwanted visual images on television, billboards, and possibly on the Internet? I can't imagine what watching a football game with my seven-year-old son would be like if there were no regulations on sexual images on network television. I am leery of an "anything goes" philosophy where pornography is concerned.

My short answer: A libertarian society is regulated directly by consumers. For example, if a football game had offensive sexual ads, parents like you would protest in the most effective way possible: turning the show off. Fewer viewers mean that sponsors will pay less for spots. Networks are driven by their bottom line to stop accepting certain types of advertising content.

You can see this process working today. Premium channels are either family- oriented or adult-oriented, so that no one is offended. Mixed channels feature adult content only during late night hours. Some televisions and cable services allow coded access to adult channels so that children can't view some stations without parental consent. Parental control programming allows adults to block Internet access to sexual and other content in their homes.

Despite parents' best efforts, however, children will be exposed to some pornography, violence, foul language, and uncharitable acts. The best protection for our children is ultimately a close relationship that encourages them to come to us for explanations and guidance.

This is especially true for parents whose sexual orientation or moral code is different from the society that they live in. If we, as parents, give government the power to decide what our children can and can't watch, one day we might find that government has outlawed the very things we hold dear. Christians are experiencing this today as the Ten Commandments, prayer and references to God are being systematically banned from schools, government buildings, etc.

When we try to force society to conform to our standards through legislation, we teach our children to deny others freedom of choice. Ultimately, the people we try to control will react by restricting our freedom to live, worship, and raise our children as we think best. To keep our freedoms, we must allow others to keep theirs.

  • * *
Reply to
Homer J Simpson
Loading thread data ...

That won't satisfy the social conservatives. What will they do if the majority of the football viewing market just shrugs off a glance at Janet Jackson's tit? We might become more like one of those commie pinko secular countries like they have over there in Europe, where kids (for some unexplained reason) appear to be unaffected by such nonsense.

The right winger's idea that nobody should interfere with a parent's right to bring up their children as they see fit breaks down when the parents' morality and god of choice doesn't align with that of the self proclaimed community leaders.

Not a problem, from the conservatives point of view. When we force society to conform to 'our' standards, we teach our children all about authority, who has it and who doesn't. The biggest blow-hard gets to set the rules for everyone else and that's the way society has run ever since the high priests threw virgins into the volcano. No doubt to convince the remaining young women in the village of the futility of remaining chaste the next time His Holiness drops by.

--
Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a pleasant Terran revolution.
Reply to
Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Aye, and the tribe overthrew (and usually killed) the high priests when it got to the point of having to use 8-year-olds for the sacrifices. That is a classic example of why it is a bad idea to let religionists or (other) bullies run society.

--
 JosephKK
 Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.  
  --Schiller
Reply to
joseph2k

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.