Re: Firefox 3.0

Jun 19, 2008 16 Replies

Jim Thompson wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:


Firefox 3.0: Anyone tried it yet?
>
> ...Jim Thompson

I'm still running W98SE.


anybody have W98SE drivers for a Lexmark X1240?? G-D Microsoft WITHDREW them June of last year,and the box said it had W98SE support,but inside was a errata sheet saying W98/ME support was no available after June 30,07.


The drivers existed,but MS -MADE- everyone pull them,even the archive sites.I can understand MS not wanting to create drivers,but to pull ones already made is underhanded and stingy.

Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net

Sheeeesh, Jim! I hold back from upgrades and only this past year went to XP, but using Win98SE is like Thomas More uttering, "...for Wales" ;-)

I always thought Win98SE was a piece-a-crap.

...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Well,each new OS requires more and more memory and uP speed,and I'm still running an old 900 Mhz Athlon with a max of 512MB of SDRAM. Up until recently,I had thought that XP needed much more than that. I don't need anything more powerful,and I don't have any money for upgrades.I was given the W98SE upgrade disc,needed to have USB support that W98 was -supposed- to have.

(and now I find that MS is stopping sales of XP for all but laptops)

MS is just a pyramid scam.

Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net

Jim Yanik wrote:

Amen.

...then there is the OPPOSITE paradigm: (I just did bookmark this and I'm already getting to use it. 8-)

"Linux runs on more hardware, more architectures and more platforms than Windows ever has." by hacker (14635)

formatting link

...and a thorough rebuttal of the ''Linux Treadmill'' idiot at #23817089:

formatting link
. . Insert &no_d2=1 into URLs if you surf with JavaScript disabled.

I had one Lexmark inkjet that would NOT work with Windows 2000 when I upgraded. That printer was canabalized and then landed in the trash heap. Replaced it with an Epson-880 that gave quite a number of years of service until it too gave up the ghost. Harvested that one and now have an HP3100. We'll see how long that lasts.

Try posting in comp.periphs.printers - one of the lurkers there may be able to point you in the right direction.

Also note Franc's post in microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion at Message-ID:

(they may actually still be there ...)

rebel wrote:

Request from a Google Grouper: Please post NNTP links in the form news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com

--especially if they have an escargot (@) in them. In the Archive, those are clickable. . As most of what you blockquoted wasn't about the W98 problem, perhaps a bit more judicious snipping as well.

rebel wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Thanks!

Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net

"Jim Yanik" skrev i en meddelelse news:Xns9AC1D0F3883D1jyanikkuanet@64.209.0.83...

... maybe there is a small chance that you can get it to run in WINE???

Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:

Heh. There were similar suggestions in a recent thread on Wine (under Windoze, no less):

formatting link
formatting link

BTW, did anybody notice that Wine 1.0 was released (after 15 years as 0.*)?

The biggest bitch I saw was that it wouldn't do M$Office 7 completely

formatting link
(well, not out of the box)
formatting link

...and that if they had held off until June 30 (when XP "expires"), it would have made a bigger bang: 8-)

formatting link
( . . Insert &no_d2=1 into the URLs if you surf with JavaScript disabled.

On a sunny day (Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:11:49 -0700 (PDT)) it happened JeffM wrote in :

Unlikely....

yes.

The problem with wine (my version) is that I cannot run wine apps remotely via ssh -Y, it seems wine is not exactly an X application, although it runs in X? For example ssh -Y snipped-for-privacy@somewhere.com cd to wherever it is wine scad3.exe fails with an error message. Works fine on the local machine though.

Good thing designing electronics stuff pays well.

Perhaps the desktop dweebs don't bitch as loud as I did (took a while to get XP install CDs for my wife's ThinkPad).

M$ makes chain letters look like a winner. Hell, they make the state lotteries look good.

Keith

I would not have been so polite about that. Try twisting Lexmark's arm some.

Actually MSWin98 is pretty good, i still have old useful machines still running it. They won't run XP. MSWin95 was a really bad piece of crap though; it would fail and reboot within a few minutes of coming up regularly.

That 900 MHz machine will run XP but you would not like it, it would be a real slug on that machine.

XP and XP support keeps getting extended, major corporate's are rejecting Vista in droves over comparability and legacy support issues. I think the Vista debacle will dwarf the ME flop by quite a bit. Worse than BOB even.

[snip]

Hey! Watch your language.

Bob

== NOTE: I automatically delete all Google Group posts due to uncontrolled SPAM ==

Not you, M$ onetime product. But you knew that >:-P

You had to mention BOB. ME wasn't THAT bad, just an extension of Windows

98SE.

Sort of like how XP is an extension to Windows 2000. But Microsoft really dropped the ball with Vista.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required