Re: board - T562.jpg

Nov 18, 2006 111 Replies

Maybe he is referring to the mouse you keep in your pocket?

BTW, the people who are only reading this in alt.binaries.schematics.electronic have to miss all my wit. Google won't let me post there.. :^(

You seem to have some analog credentials. Maybe you could divert some of this thread to answer a question about switched cap voltage converters.

Where I am currently working we need to convert a wide battery voltage range to typical circuit voltages, such as 5, 3.3, etc. volts. The battery voltage varies from 7 to 17 typically. We can used inductive switchers for this, but it is in a radio and we prefer not to use these. They are also not so efficient when running at low currents, at least the ones we can buy as chips. By low I mean

Just kill file any cartoon character you see posting on a newsgroup.

Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida

These sweats don't have pockets, and anyhow I'm surrounded by cats. And why would I keep a USB Logitech in my pocket?

Ah, wit. Thanks for pointing it out to us.

John

I didn't know there was any such thing as an *efficient* switched-cap regulator. Their only convenience lies in small size. They are particularly nice when there is no load current... such as the bias for an integrated electret microphone in a hearing aid chip I designed last year ;-)

However, if you're switching large currents... thus low resistance switches, driving the gate capacitance *will* be a major contributor to your losses.

Are you certain you wouldn't be better off with an inductive switcher?

What are your actual I/O requirements.

...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Why can't a switched cap converter be efficient? The only losses are in the resistance of the swtich (same as an inductive switcher) and the difference in voltage between the switched output and the end circuit. I was thinking along the lines of using multiple topologies to get a good voltage match to the required output voltage at any given input voltage. 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, I even came up with a circuit to provide

2.5:1, but that is likely overkill.

Two problems with inductive switchers running from higher voltages; 1) the losses are significant when running at lower currents like < 100 mA. My current board has to run in idle at 100 mW and provide up to 2 watts in full performance mode. With a 9:1 ratio of operation, losses at 100 mW can be significant.

2) Inductors generate a *LOT* of noise and this is inside a radio! We use inductive switchers because it is a 5 watt unit. But we have to keep the well filters, isolated and they still create too much noise so we synchronize them to a common clock to put the spurs in known places.

Input ranges from 7 to 17 volts. Outputs are at 5, 3.3 and 1.8 volts. I would only expect the main switcher to generate 5 volts as the others can be made from that. It should run from a 600 kHz reference clock, but that can be divided down if needed to make the circuit work efficiently. The output current for efficient operation would range from 20 mA to 250 mA.

Is this anything like practical?

I've completely lost the point of this now. Have you?

HOLLY CRAP!!! THERE WAS A POINT???

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Late at night, by candle light, "Homer J Simpson" penned this immortal opus:

Actually I was referring to YOU and Fields. Take Jim, Mike and Graham along, make it a slurp-all-you-can fest.

- YD.

Remove HAT if replying by mail.

Late at night, by candle light, "Homer J Simpson" penned this immortal opus:

Obviously. No.

- YD.

Remove HAT if replying by mail.

Then what has it to do with finding prime numbers on a microcomputer?

Late at night, by candle light, "Homer J Simpson" penned this immortal opus:

NFI. You should know.

- YD.

Remove HAT if replying by mail.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required