I don't know about that. Transmission companies have such a strong natural monopoly that they have to be regulated in the public interest. Rent-seeking isn't what's usually considered 'free'.
Those would be antique horse-drawn wooden Cummins diesels?
Something along the lines of a small diesel truck engine is all that's required for most houses. It's the expense, maintenance, and (especially) noise that's the problem for most of us, I think.
No. Hydro is cheap, cheap, cheap, and pumped storage efficiencies are quite reasonable. With pumped storage, you can use bigger turbines on a given dam, because you don't have to match it with the available flow, or worry as much about depleting the reservoir in the dry season. So the incremental cost of pumped storage can be far less than the generation cost.
Sooooo?
I don't know about that either. Making an array that can steer 120 degrees in elevation doesn't need to be much much more expensive than one that steers 40 degrees. Given that you can get ~ 1 kW peak out of a square inch or so of silicon using concentrators, then assuming a average/peak ratio of 1/6 and $0.16/kWH electricity, you'd be getting about $230 per year worth of electricity out of that square inch of silicon. The cost for the concentrator is a bit harder to figure, but assuming it could stow itself to prevent damage, it wouldn't need to be that heavy-duty.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs