PCI sound cards and their sample-playback kakaa MIDI must burn


I know I've brought this subject up -- and in other groups -- before but I just can't get over it. I apologize profusely to those who might be annoyed.

PCI sound stinks. Like kakaa it does.

I just wish the audio communties would revert back to real, non-emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there.

FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample-playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa

SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its all kakaa-like emulation.

SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames.

AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called "Yamaha FM synth". I don't really like it though, it is emulation. The Avance sound card has "Avance FM synth", but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot -- ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM synth.

Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only 'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical barrier to this?

I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness, warmth, and liveliness *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI synth.

I don't care for other MIDI synths.

Creative Music Synth [220] is:

  1. Real


  1. Digital


  1. Hardware


  1. Real-time

All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also fine. But I don't care for them.

Here is my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best to worst:

  1. Creative Music Synth [220]
  2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220]
  3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths
  4. Sample-playback synths

Sample-playback synths are the worst.

Sample playback synths STEEEENKS!!!!

Sample-playback MIDI synths are the worst audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy, irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying.

I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent.

The only thing about Creative Labs that I like is their Creative Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa.

Creative Labs is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty customer service. Their tech support is so limited.

Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans.

I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] only to be totally-ignored.

Creative Labs also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting sample-playback synths in their PCI cards.

I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220] would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware versions of Creative Music Synth [220] upgraded from 16-bit to 32-bit and from 44.1 Khz to 192 Khz. And from there, keep on upgrading!

If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties up the people who make up that company and torturously force them to repeatedly listen to sample-playback MIDI synths and emulation until those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded versions of Creative Music Synth [220].

A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously hijacked and forced to do their duties.

I feel like torching the chips of sample-playback synths with oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output.

Anyone who respectfully uses any sample-playback MIDI synth needs to be put in a mental hospital ASAP for his/her own good as [s]he is a danger to him/herself.

Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth.

Its those sample-playback synths that are crap.

Sadly most MIDI magazines advertise the kakaa-stinky sample playback as a good thing often referring to them as "wavetables". These sick marketers call sample-playback synthesis "realistic sounding".

Sample-playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky fart emitted from a human colon.

I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any sample-playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the nose.

I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human-behind emulation.

Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample-playback synthesis as "wavetables" deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat their own crap.

There is a world of different between sample-playback synthesis and wavetable synthesis.

Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample-playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite.

If a synth is *not*:

  1. *Real*


  1. *Digital*


  1. *Real-time*


  1. *Hardware*


Here is what I would like to do. I would like to make some replicable electronic nanobots that will search for sample playback MIDI synths in any part of the world and attach to the digital chips of sample-playback MIDI synths. These nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will extract any random enviromental magnetic audio signals 2 khz and 50 khz [excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink noise and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the point where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause inductive crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic chips of the sample-playback MIDI synths.

That way all companies will be forced to make *real* synths and the listeners will be forced to adapt to the excellent audio quality of

*real* synths. For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of sample-playback synths, well, f--k you!

I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so-called 'karaoke voice cancellor' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo chanel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel -- which results in anything identical in both the left and right channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left and right channels.

When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice-cancellor, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and crisper than when I don't use the voice-cancellor.

Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.



Reply to
Loading thread data ...

Point 1: This is a forum for live sound reinforcement issues, not home computers. Check before you post your shit.

Point 2: You're full of crap anyway. There are good and bad PCI cards. Soundblaster stuff is bottom feeder shit, but there are lots of excellent PCI sound cards out there. Try Echo Labs or Focusrite amongst many others. Even EMU cards, also from Creative, actually perform quite well.


Reply to
Bob Howes

Please, Please, PLEASE, everyone ignore Raduim! He is a huge troll. He will continue asking stupid, idiotic questions as long as anyone will respond to him, so please don't respond to his posts!

Reply to
Mike Rieves

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.