paralleling relay coils

I am connecting five 12V relay coils in parallel to switch five different loads. Is it necessary to have fly-back diode for each relay coil or just one 1N400x diode in parallel is sufficient? Each coil is 300 ohms.

-bhavj

Reply to
bhav.jnk
Loading thread data ...

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com schrieb:

Hello,

the current through one coil is 40 mA, the five coils take 200 mA. A

1N400x is good for 1 A. If these five relays are not far away from each other, only diode will do in my opinion. The current flowing through the diode should not be much larger than the current flowing through all coils together.

Bye

Reply to
Uwe Hercksen

Make sure you use the low-voltage one, 1N4001. Higher-voltage diodes of that series have long turn-on delays, so they aren't much good for suppressing inductive kicks.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 USA 
+1 845 480 2058 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

The relays stacked together and trace length is approx 70 mm from 1st relay coil to the 5th relay coil. So, do you think it would be a better option to place the diode across the coil of the middle (3rd) relay?

Reply to
bhav.jnk

Thanks. Would it be better to use 1A schottky than normal diodes like 1N400x?

Reply to
bhav.jnk

The 1N4001 should be fine, but do use at least a 60V transistor to drive the relays.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 USA 
+1 845 480 2058 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

BCX56 is the transistor. Relay coils are connected between emitter and ground. 12V is applied at the collector.

Reply to
bhav.jnk

Oh, that's easy then. When the emitter goes low, current will continue to flow without interruption until it decays. No spikes to worry about at all, no diode needed, as long as you don't open-circuit the base.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

One more thing: Do watch out for oscillation. Putting 100 ohms or so in series with the base will usually cure it. (A transistor with its collector and base at the same voltage is still in normal bias, and can still oscillate.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

It doesn't matter where the flyback diode is located.

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom timing and laser controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer 
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
John Larkin

I always use a transistor or MOSFET with internal diode. No need for an external diode.

--
Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply 
indicates you are not using the right tools... 
nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to
Nico Coesel

may be of interest

formatting link

Reply to
bud--

The OP should post his schematic. I've seen interesting things, like putting TTL levels into a base and expecting 12 volt swing at the emitter.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom laser drivers and controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro   acquisition and simulation
Reply to
John Larkin

I was sort of assuming that it was CD4000 CMOS, but you're right, you never can tell.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Here is the schematic I quickly drafted. All the 5 coils and fly back diode are in parallel and will be connected to 12V_RLY_COIL.

formatting link

Reply to
bhav.jnk

The idea is for the diode to protect the switching device (xsistor, FET, whatever) from the switching spike. The diode is usually placed near the coil connections so that the current produced by the spike does not couple to nearby circuits, as it would if the diode were placed on or in the switching device. If the switching device and the relays are all located very close together, it probably doesn't matter. However, if the relays are scattered all over the PCB, it might be better to suppress the spikes at the source, near the coils.

In my checkered past, I helped design an HF automatic antenna tuner. There were about 20 relays that would cycle a collection of inductors and capacitors through a binary search pattern until a suitably low VSWR match was found. Tuning speed was important, so some of the relays sometimes sounded like buzzers. The now ancient microprocessor used (Intel 8748) was rather sensitive to noise. However, it wasn't RF that was causing temporarily insanity in the uP. It was switching transients traceable to back EMF from the relay coils. Nobody had mentioned to the PCB layout person that the flyback diodes needed to be close to the relay coils. The next PCB revision moved them much closer, which produced far less noise. The rest of the noise was caused by trying to open or close all 20 relays at once (ground bounce), which required adding some filter caps and some slight delays in the firmware. I don't think this will be a problem with only 5 relays in parallel unless there's sensitive circuitry nearby.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Sorry, you have just been demoted to SCI Electronics Basic! Harry

Reply to
Harry Dellamano

I was thinking the same thing with a NPN and the collector tied to the

12v rail, you'd need to take the Base above the 12v rail to turn it on.

Cheers

Reply to
Martin Riddle

Is that supposed to be funny?

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

Harry is right.. there are multiple issues.

1) Can we assume you're trying to drive the relays with a 3.3V CMOS output, and 3.3V in should turn the relays "on"?

1a) If so, is the common for the 3.3V supply same as the ground shown?

2) Any particular reason you want a high-side driver (so one side of the relays is grounded)?

3) Is this an automotive 12V system with the associated transient issues?

4) What's with the 100uF cap across the relays, and the 0.1uF cap, for that matter?

--sp

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.