Sci.aeronautics is dead, it seems, so allow me to ask here. At least it's not about climate, politics or removing X signs.
Why are there so few planes with canard wings? It seems to me an obvious way to gain a few percent of efficiency: The tail of an ordinary plane needs to have negative lift for stability, which needs to be compensated for by extra wing lift. A canard, on the other hand, contributes positive lift, so I'd expect less overall drag for the equivalent total lift. So why are there so few that do this?
Jeroen Belleman