his ratio sequence. Even he should
the sequence turn out to be the way we
ng
vergence
Haven't looked at the wiki proofs but there seems to be some kind of confus ion over series convergence. Formally, the series comprised of terms s1, s2 , s3,... is said to converge to a limit L if the series of partial sums S1, S2, S3, converges to L in the conventional analytic sense, where the parti al sum Sk=s1+s2+...+sk.
The harmonic series is trivial to analyze when you can do things like take sums over say 1/(N+1) + 1/(N+2) + 1/(N+N) > 1/(N+N) + 1/(N+N) + ...+1/(N+N) = N x 1/(N+N)= 0.5. Since there are an infinite number of non-overlappi ng subseries of this type, there are an infinite number of sums exceeding 0 .5, which, being a lower bound for the full series sum, sounds like an unbo unded sum to me.