OT. DDWFTTW YES NO

My initial thought gave Larkin the benefit of the doubt... he knows what he's doing as he yanks everyone's chain.

Then I switch back to thinking that Larkin is really just dumb as a stump. ...Jim Thompson

om...

The

it

r.

MikeK

I initially was skeptical of the claims based on conservation on energy, but I was convinced of their validity by careful viewing of the video, the certification by an independent agency, and studying a good analysis (not the ones presented in the newsgroup).

You appear to be skeptical of the claims simply because you oppose anything posted by John Larkin. That fits with the mental decline you have exhibited here the last few months.

Schedule the CAT scan now, before it is too late.

.com...

an The

d it

ver.

=A0 MikeK

do

I told you dorks that a couple years ago at least.

Yup, he stopped thinking some time back, a year or so roughly.

John

Deriving an energy input via the belt is hardly the same as a sailboat moving downwind faster than the wind.

I'm truly amazed that there are lurkers here who think you're getting something for nothing.

You don't have sufficient mental power to understand the scam.

He does seem to be on a roll scamming this group.

You exhibited such a loss years ago.

GFY. ...Jim Thompson

The

We've been telling you the same thing for *many* years, AlwaysWrong. You don't listen either.