OT: Amusing Google conversion of the week

Google: 0.08 mm^2 in miles per US gallon

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

-- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" snipped-for-privacy@interlog.com Info for manufacturers:

formatting link
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers:
formatting link

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany
Loading thread data ...

OK. I give up. It that supposed to make sense?

Reply to
Michael

Neato..Gee don't stop there... I tried these..

0.08 (square millimeters) = 29.4018229 miles per US gallon 0.08 (mm^2) = 7.7671399 miles per liter 0.08 (mm^2) = 0.0382836236 miles per US teaspoon 0.08 (millimeters^2) = 12.5 kilometers per liter

0.08 (mm^2) = 12 500 millimeters per milliliter

0.08 (mm^2) = 61 611 519.9 microns per US teaspoon

D from BC myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com British Columbia Canada

Reply to
D from BC

Sure, fuel consumption has units of area, right?

mpg is proportional to the reciprocal.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

It seems to be reading mm^2 for L/km, which give the same result. In that correct result, it automatically accounts for L/km mapping to mpg, despite the inversion.

--
John
Reply to
John O'Flaherty

Oh! Of course, it's right - L/km is identical to mm^3/mm, and that is mm^2. Sort of. So fuel consumption does in fact have units of volume/length, which is area.

--
John
Reply to
John O'Flaherty

I always suspected you have far too much time on your hands ;-)

Reply to
who where

Dimensionally sound. Presumably four cylinders?

Reply to
rebel

That is *so* counter-intuitive. But correct. My heard hurts. Thanks... I think. :-)

--
Michael
Reply to
Michael

"Spehro Pefhany" wrote

mm^2 = area

miles/gallon = distance/volume = 1/area

gallons/mile = volume/distance = area

Google gives:

0.08 (mm^2) = 29.4018229 miles per US gallon

and

0.08 (mm^2) = 0.0340114966 US gallons per mile

Surely only the latter is valid? What am I missing?

Reply to
Andrew Holme

Do the math. What's 29.4018229 * 0.0340114966?

Good Luck! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

Surely you mean fuel consumption has units of length/volume?

Example:

30 miles/gal x 1609 m/mile x 264 gal/m^3 = 12.7E6 m^(-2)

Michael

Reply to
mrdarrett

That's the reciprocal-- what they call "fuel economy". A bigger number implies higher efficiency.

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

Gotcha. Fuel consumption = gallons per mile = 1/mpg... the smaller the better... mpg: the larger the better... I'm feeling silly now... ;)

M
Reply to
mrdarrett

Glad to be of service. ;-)

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

For more laughs: since 1 US gallon of gasoline = 1.3E8 Joules, and W = E = (F)(d), then [volume of gasoline] / [distance] = force. So [fuel economy] = [Newtons]

Oh joy!

Michael

Reply to
mrdarrett

dependant on the efficiency of the engine.

this same unit as friction, which makes sense.

Reply to
Jasen Betts

That is odd, i have the idea that friction is force over force (or unitless).

Reply to
JosephKK

force.

Friction is a force.

Reply to
Richard Henry

[1913 Webster]: The resistance which a body meets with from the surface on which it moves. It may be resistance to sliding motion, or to rolling motion.

I was using (perhaps misusing) it to mean all the forces that resist the motion of the vehichle (drivetrain losses, atmospheric drag, etc..)

you are thinking of "coefficient of friction" which measures is a property of many pairs of surfaces that friction is linearly dependant on the contact force.

Reply to
Jasen Betts

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.