The Rohm BH226F. If it's any good, it could replace a lot of PWMs.
formatting link
Anybody used them?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
formatting link
formatting link
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
B
bitrex
The settling time and and integral nonlinearity specs are very Meh;
100uS (Min) - jeez, for real?
I think the TI quad DAC08 variants with SPI like D084S085 are pretty nice for a buck
P
Phil Hobbs
Well, it's to replace a bunch of PWMs. ;)
Those are nicer, for sure, but twice as much money.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.net
https://hobbs-eo.com
W
Winfield Hill
BH2221 12-channels.
Thanks,
- Win
P
Phil Hobbs
Have you used it for anything?
Thanks
Phil
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
formatting link
formatting link
B
bitrex
I use the ATTiny85 as a "general purpose low-frequency thing building block" that's under a dollar, I got this software suite that lets you drag-and-drop functional blocks like clocks, counters, PWM outputs, etc. "wire" them up into a system, assign port numbers, push a button and it generates C++, compiles it and uploads it to the uP for testing in under
30 seconds.
The Rohm chip might make a good team with the ATTiny, the main flaw in a lot of applications is it only has three hardware PWM outputs on fixed pins, one of which ties up an ADC channel if you use it.
Stepping up to a core with any more than three hardware PWM channels is a significant increase in footprint and price
W
Winfield Hill
Not that one, but other Rohm stuff, I'm happy to believe their specs.
Thanks,
- Win
W
Winfield Hill
I'm getting down on using PWM outputs, DACs are so cheap.
Thanks,
- Win
K
klaus.kragelund
There is a crapload of microes that has fast 12bit DACs
PWM has slow response, if you need 12 bit accuracy. And injects noise from the supply
Cheers
Klaus
W
whit3rd
The ROHM devices are R/2R ladder based, so they too will pass noise from the supply (no internal reference, or reference pin).
... if you get the twelve-output one, and only need nine, could it help if one were to put filter capacitor(s) on the other outputs, and set 'em all high? That would put a decoupling capacitor on the chip side of any Vcc wiring drop.
Heck, you could use an AC-coupled amp to do an active filter...
R
Robert Baer
Impressive! Why the 2 packages? The big one is rather wasteful of space..
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.