Yes, and then D, given the uncertainty of the IC input capacitance, wiring capacitance, etc., select a larger value, say 33pF, and reduce the resistor as needed.
Ahh..the more predictable, less design time approach.
I wonder how often engineers use logic Cin to make some RC lag when needed. I suppose if the RC tolerance is wide enough, it should be ok to do..
However, there's uncertainty, testing required* and more math that might peeve a designer on the clock.. I can see why overwhelming the Cin with 33pF is a quicker solution.
*There's no Cin spec for Vdd=5V, only Vdd=3.3V. My app is at Vdd=5V.
Not that you can rely on that value. I think it's listed as a "typical" capacitance, but in the sense that we typically assign 5pF of input capacitance to an input node, without really knowing, and more or less taking adding in some of the capacitance from whatever might be connected to the input node.
Where I've carefully measured the capacitance, mostly older HC types, etc., it's typically been much less than 5pF. I'd expect newer LVC stuff to be even less. That's why I suggested swamping the 5pF with external capacitance. Furthermore, if one's input is from an off-baord source, with a connector, etc., it's a good idea to add a second resistor, from your RC, to the gate input, so your RC can act as a spark-discharge filter and give the gate's protection a better chance.
That term is usually reserved for versions with inductors.
In the end you'd have to decide how accurate your delay has to be. Relying on Cin is something I never do. One day a "new and improved" chip comes out, the new guy being blissfully unaware of a hairy design signs the ECO, the purchasing guys order the reels and a few weeks later some hollering is heard in production. Followed by some more hollering in the board room.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.