Bwuahahahahahahahahaahahahaha!
What part of the word "permanent" do you not understand?
Bwuahahahahahahahahaahahahaha!
What part of the word "permanent" do you not understand?
Sam My Boat is so small.(just a barrel) Still wind was first used and every motor has a fly wheel. Flywheel can store energy. They are protential energy and go round and round I like that feature TreBert
Its
How odd, i can't think of an electric motor nor a turbine that has a = flywheel.
s
heel.
I have seen more than one electric motor with a flywheel.
(1) On a quite seriously fast punch machine for making the E core shapes out of sheet metal, the motor had a flywheel and the mechanical bit went bang-bang at about a 10Hz rate cutting the metal.
(2) A little toy electric motor had just one coil and contact and worked a little like a 2 stroke gas engine.
s
heel.- Hide quoted text -
You should think a lot more. Rotor of electric motor is very heavy and acts like its flywheel Same is true for the heavy blades of turbines. Best read up on diesel electric trains. TreBert
MG sets often have flywheels.
Its
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TreBert
flywheel.- Hide quoted text -
Just the same you had made a blanket statement that was easy to punch = holes in. On top of that there are electric motors that do not have iron armatures = precisely=20 to reduce the rotating mass. Also the blades of high speed turbines are = very=20 decidedly not heavy, simply because they would come off at the high = rotational=20 rates (in excess of 100,000 rpm). Care to join the us readers?
flywheel.- Hide quoted text -
No turbine on diesel electric train. Piston diesel engine, driving electric generator, driving electric traction motor. The loading is so heavy that there is no "flywheel effect" of any of these components that makes any difference. The diesel engine rpm determines the rest based on the load. All three sponge into each other and rpm reductions play right down through the chain immediately without any flywheel effect whatsoever. Magnetic fields push hard... or not.
Perhaps a water turbine cares not about the mass of its blades, but a jet engine turbine most certainly cannot have high centrifugal forces or the blades will explode (fly apart). They are deliberately kept as light as possible. The entire assembly rotates easily, to be sure, but I would not attribute a lot of "flywheel effect" or gyroscopic inertia to it, though it will have far more than ANY train component. It spins at 100k rpm!
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required