Legalities and signal jamming

Apr 29, 2006 11 Replies

Does anyone here know about the legalities of building small signal jammers for say the 2.4gig small camera transmitters. What I was meaning is if someone asked you to design and build them a personal signal jammer, ( them being parranoid they may have a hidden camera somewhere ), Would one step into legallity areas to build a jammer for them?



Yes, I understand that the hidden camera itself is illegal but can't justify ( 2 wrongs ), if the jammer is also illegal. These days one must tread lightly :) Also if making a jammer, be it low power, would not cross the line - has anyone allready been there, done that, got the teeshirt :) --evil grin! .... Thanks for any help guys... JTT


Wouldn't it make more sense to build a field strength meter?

A band selectable tuned circuit could be nice, but the instrument would still cover a greater range of possibilites than a jammer would.

I deny ever making a similar device for jamming a neighbors TV reception.

Luhan Monat (luhanxmonat-at-yahoo^dot^com)

formatting link
"Reality: what a concept!"

If it's on a license-free band, then there's no problem from the FCC - the band is license-free, so you can do whatever you want. You would only have to contend with the guy whose signal you're jamming.

If it's in one of the bands that needs a license, then you need to comply with the licensing requirements, and not cause any interference to any other equipment. I believe that there are certain very low signal levels that don't need a license, but I'd look very carefully at the regulations on that. And even so, you'd still have to contend with the guy whose signal you're jamming.

formatting link

Good Luck! Rich

Into illegality. The easy way to take care of the transmitter is to get a hammer, a spectrum analyzer, a directional antenna, and go looking for it.

I think that 'license free' bands are actually not quite that simple. Usually the rule is two part - the unlicensed device must accept any interference from other sources, and must not cause any interference to other services. As such, license free only means free to (attempt to) use, not free to jam other users.

What's unlcear is if the must not cause interefernce applies only to licensed services or to other unlicensed services as well - my guess is that if the intent to cause interference is intentional, then the prohibition probably would apply.

You may be able to find a legitimate non-communications device which cases the desired interference though. I had a very nice microwave link running the lab until someone turned on the microwave oven in the kitchenette...

It's easier to build a broadband or multiband field strength meter than a broadband jammer. Who says the hidden camera is 2.4 GHz? There are many possibilities, and detecting them all is easier than jamming them all, at least for continuously transmitting devices.

Store and burst is another issue.

Easy if you have a spectrum analyzer.

Yes, it would be better. But then if you find it and hammer it to pieces, you wont catch the spy. logic is, if you can jam the signal and setup your own camera to record area. You then catch the spy trying to fix what went wrong with his camera. JTT.

The OP. "James Thompson wrote: Does anyone here know about the legalities of building small signal jammers for say the 2.4gig small camera transmitters."

Not true. The FCC spells it out here: http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations_2&id=cellular

http://www.storms-end.com/japanphotos/040813_comiket/31_spy_vs_spy.jpg

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required