LDO specs

May 16, 2010 24 Replies

Nope, you use two cascaded RC lowpasses in the base lead. It has a total of three lags in the loop...you have to make the op amp really slow to avoid oscillation. You win by a factor of C_CE/C_bypass, which can easily be 10**7.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net

Understood--at all signal frequencies you're stuck with the behaviour of a barefoot BJT follower. OTOH that isn't so bad for a lot of things, especially frond end amps for photodiodes and other sensors with a lot of capacitance to worry about. It sure helps the PSR of op amps!

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net

=3D497-...

a 5V

to

en

V

ut at

Mac

ome

ier.

ity

se

y a

to

t

to

eed

d

pass

ood

e

pass

how

he

1A
6V
y

=A0!

=A0!

=A0 =A0!

h

I see. My version of the circuit requires that the reference be quiet. Yours doesn't.

formatting link

Yup--voltage references are horribly noisy--even worse than 300 kelvin resistors. You can get nanovolt noise at frequencies where you care about it, for things like photodiode biasing and discrete circuitry with poor supply rejection.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

=3D497-...

me a 5V

or to

when

1 V

tput at

g Mac

some

ifier.

ility

orse

say a

st to

hat

t to

s

bleed

ned

e pass

good

the

r pass

ut

show

the

is

ve 1A

h 6V

,

od

lly

ed

=A0!

=A0!

/e

=A0 =A0!

hich

Band gaps are really bad. 1.xxV with 500nV/sqrt(Hz) is a lot worse than 6.xxV with 100nV/sqrt(Hz)

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required