That's my 1rst impulse. Hard to ensure 50% duty with the self- oscillator + slew rate stuff.
Linear's got quiet slew-rate limited switcher chips.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
That's my 1rst impulse. Hard to ensure 50% duty with the self- oscillator + slew rate stuff.
Linear's got quiet slew-rate limited switcher chips.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
Check out the LT3439 (slew rate limited). I found it worked very well as a DC transformer (its datasheet shows you how) with an off-the-shelf transformer. Couple of points -
- wrap a shorting turn round the transformer to reduce radiated flux
- use a transformer with about 500-1000uH primary inductance to avoid wasting power / heating the IC unecessarily. If you have one of those standard 6 coil types, you can put 2 coils in series for 4 times the L (not twice, 'cos they are on the same core)
- you can get by with 10uF ceramics for the output, it switches around
120kHz- follow up with C-multipliers on the output for an unregulated but very quiet rail.
Nemo
But I am sure John won't want to spend the two bux in the BOM :-)
if it sits next to a 12bit 250MHz adc I'm not sure 1-2$ will make such a big difference
-Lasse
Actually, I ordered some IRS2153D's, a very simlar part. Maybe if I use biggish gate resistors and keep the frequency down I can get tolerable efficiency and low noise. It may need a snubber, not sure. I'll build one on Monday.
My little emitter follower thing seems to work, but it's not very efficient.
A couple of bux of parts cost is not a big deal here. Getting it to work the first time is.
John
... just enough to cause the transistor to conduct the magnetising current to the opposing rail - clamping the winding in the lossiest way possible, Imag x VCC losses being absorbed by the bipolar transistor that is supposed to be 'off'.
RL
just wait till jf hears you are playing with what is basically a 555 and a halfbridge driver :P
-Lasse
But yesterday you wrote that you wanted it cheap in case you build lots of them :-)
Reminds me of a time when I was designing something for the guys where things must have cast-iron robustness. I sat there in agony and a manager asked me whether I had problems with my design. "Not technical ones but these multipliers are over $6, a piece". A whole group of people around me had listened in. They and the manager burst into thundering laughter ...
So, getting a self oscillating thing to work seems too complicated ?
Use a PIC.
Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
It should be pretty easy to throw some randomness into the frequency with a PIC for a spread-spectrum converter.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
The magnetizing current tends to turn the "wrong" transistor on, but the load current mitigates that. A snubber helps, too. It's not hard to make all the currents play nice.
I did find a weird asymmetry that turned out to be a feature of LT Spice. If you specify a pulse generator of
Ton 5 us Tr 1 us Tf 1 us Tper 10 us
you get an asymmetric waveform. You need Ton of 4u to get symmetry.
John
Within reason. I don't want to buy a 5-watt potted dc/dc converter for $30, or custom magnetics for $10. The IR thing is under $1 in quantity, and doesn't need a lot of external parts. This one even includes the bootstrap diode. I still want to use a stock dual-winding inductor as the transformer. Our per-part kitting/placement cost is high, so we take that into account too. Our customer, probably wildly optimistic, estimates maybe 800 boxes a year, so it's worth spending a day considering alternate ways to do this. Besides, playing with circuits is fun.
Our customer just decided to use a 600 watt single-mode fiber laser to
*illuminate* part of this gadget. "Cost is no object" is the term I heard. That doesn't stop them from making occasional, and ineffective, stabs at us to cut our pricing.John
Actually, that does look complicated.
Where would the PIC get its power from?!
Just getting a square wave clock isn't hard. The power drivers are what I'm playing with. I want a quiet, efficient, cheap, low-risk
5-watt dc/dc converter that uses stock parts, and I want it designed and proven by, say, Monday afternoon. That's not unreasonable, is it?John
Unfortunately it guzzles 5mA Iq though. It's a self-zenered device so you'll probably be burning 200mW by it just sitting there.
That's why I suggested the A&Q part. It even has the timing RC integrated (or probably some sort of ring oscillator). I try to get companies away from kitting, never believed in it and always saw it as a waste of time. At Endosonics which was a fairly big company with around
150 folks in production we succeeded in getting rid of it and went to Kanban-style. Huge savings. Made the stock price rise :-)I sometimes have that as well. Major project, 6-7 figures, and then someone occasionally worries about an additional travel expenses to the tune of a few hundred bucks.
I did a box that used a bunch of the LTM8023 bricks. I built a TinyLogic schmitt oscillator and used the triangle to FM all the switchers a little. It spread the switcher noise spectrum beautifully.
John
Uh, we're talking 10 figures here.
John
[...]
Oh, sounds like courtesy of the taxpayer. As in "free" :-)
John Larkin a écrit :
Arghhhh, why did I forgot that for my last project? (PCB has just been sent to fab...)
Thanks for the reminder.
On a sunny day (Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:11:37 -0700) it happened John Larkin wrote in :
I do not get it, you can use that same circuit you recommended and I used for the PMT HV supply. Just one transistor, 1 resistor, 1 transformer, 3 caps, and some diodes. I have used it in the past with the feedback in the base to power many things, for example my old EPROM programmer, from 5 V.
What exactly did you do? Dither the voltage?
If you were using a bunch, wouldn't multi-phase synchronous operation be better?
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required