Is it FREE ENERGY or what?

Jan 31, 2008 4 Replies

Do like this:



Put a source of DC or AC current with an electronical millisecond switch and a capacitor of the same power like the source with another switch and finally the load.



When the first switch is on, the other must be off and viceversa, all the time.



If you will make this circuit to run by keeping only one thing in your mind, that is of NEVER PUT THE SOURCE IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE LOAD, probably you shall have some FREE ENERGY.



I mean the time till your source will be off its power will be much more greater with this circuit attached than puting in direct contact the source with the load.



It's better to see the whole document here:



formatting link



First, I urge you to try it and write your comments after, please.


[... deleted yet another idea that doesn't work ...]

If you think you have designed a system where E + MC^2 does not remain constant, you are always wrong. Solar energy is the closest we have to free energy. It is a very important source of energy. Consider what it would cost to provide all of that outdoor lighting if the sun didn't.

This guy has been peddling this idea for over a decade, yet he's not managed to make anything commercial out of it. The only money he makes is from plans and donations.

But the field is wide open . . .

Is that cost to be evaluated after the earth cools to 4K?

No, you have to make the heaters too. I was just taking the easier part to compute.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required