intentional Slew rate limiting

Mar 16, 2007 11 Replies

I need to make a high curent driver (say 500mA peak) that I can adjust the slew from say 50nS to 500nS in both directings. The input is 3.3V digital and the ouput is a 0- 10V square wave driving about 200ft of wire. I figure the lump capacitance is about 1000pF. I need to adjust he slew rate to reduce the amount of cross coupling from this wire to its parellel neighbor but I need the edges as sharp as I an get them.



I'm looking at lower end FET drivers with resistors between the output and the line. Is there a way to make these have a linear slew from 0 - 10Vover the 25 - 250nS range mentioned?



Any other circuit ideas for intentionally limiting the slew?


I've made multiple similar circuits requiring precision slewing ramp rates, using high-speed amplifiers and programmable opamp slew-rate circuits. I doubt you need a high level of accuracy, so a more simple scheme could work for you. There's a concept called a Miller integrator, which you can implement by adding a feedback capacitor from the output MOSFET's drain to gate, plus use a series gate resistor to set the dV/dt integration rate, where Rgate = Vin-Vgs / dVo/dt determines the gate resistor.

Maybe a second FET with the drain & source between the driver output & a cap to ground?

W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them." . | ,. w , \\|/ \\|/ Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

"Mook Johnson"

** Why ?

** That would be a massive source a radio interference on AM and SW bands.
** 5 pF per ft - so it sure ain't co-ax.
** The solutions to crosstalk are well known.

Co-axial cable, metal shielding, twisted pairs etc.

Use one of them.

..... Phil

View in a fixed-width font such as Courier.

. . . . . ---- . | d | . .--------| -- |-------. . | | dt | | . | ---- | . -| | . +V-- --- ---- | . | | + | -- | | \\ | . ----- | | ------| \\ |----------| > ----+---->

. | | | /_ | | / . -V-- - - ---- . . .

[snip]

Below is the downmarket, belt 'n braces suggestion.

+15V---+---+-----+ | |0.1? | | === \\220 \\_|_ | / Zener,5V1 /_\\ | | | | |/e +---+---|pnp 23mA\\|/ _|_ |\\ | /_\\ | \\ | | Linear 430 / '-----+ +1 amp. \\ _|_ | \\_/ -+- +15V 0V-+- | _ | 20mA\\|/Constant. | \\| +------------+--|+1>-->Out 38mA\\|/Switched. | |_/| 3.3V-+-----+------. _|_ | | | | | \\_/ C=== -+- -5V |\\| |/ | | | ---| >---|npn | +--------. | Tr/f = 10*C/19mA |/| |\\e | | _|_ | | | |/ \\| /_\\ | 0V--+- +----| npn |--. | | | |\\e e/| | | | | | | '---+---+-0V | '-+-' | | Diodes are Schottky. \\ \\ 680/ /110 \\ \\ | | -5V --+--------+-----

If C = Cstray = 50pF then Tr/f(min) = 26nS.

If C = (470+50)pF then Tr/f = 274nS.

Tony Williams.

You ask about 'other' ideas.

Well, there's an OLD idea that might work: an increductor. The inductance of a simple choke will be the slew rate limiter, and the inductance responds to the field in the core, so you make a high-impedance winding with some DC current in it and at high DC current it has low inductance (50 nS slew into load) and at low DC current it has high inductance (resulting in

500 nS slew into load). The signal is sent through a low-impedance winding in the same core.

Because it's current-programmed, it's easy to adjust. Capacitors with voltage-adjust are generally not of such size as to work for 500 nS delay at 500 mA drive.

Its too bad the CA3080 isn't with us today. There was a nifty circuit that used one of them to make slew rate limiting.

But here's an idea

ASCII art:

--------------------------- ! ! ! r-r opamp ---!!---+ ---!+\\ ! ! ! >-+-/\\/\\----+--!-\\ ! ---/\\/\\--+-!-/ ! ! >--+------- Output ! ! GND-----!+/ --!!-- Power op-amp

The r-r opamp limits the slew rate by hitting its power supply rails. Finding a r-r opamp that recovers well from this may be the biggest problem with this.

-- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

The classic slew limiter is a diode bridge...

i+ | | + / \\ a a k k / \\ in---------+ +-------+------out \\ / | a a | k k c \\ / | + | | gnd | i-

where current i into the cap sets the slew rate.

John

Ken Smith a écrit :

AD8036/8037

Thanks, Fred.

You are correct the capacitance is actually 10,000pF or 50pf/foot. The cable is twisted shielded quad (4 wires inside a single shield). Wire to wire coupling capacitance is about 10p/ft.

My opinion is that the situatuin is near hopeless for high speed communication. As soon as you get the edges steep enough to look like digital its going to crosstalk like a SOB.

mook Johnson a écrit :

Is it quad or dual pairs? Do you have a ref?

For long cables, quad is worse than twisted pairs since it's coupling the same way all along the path. Twisted pairs cancel much of this.

Thanks, Fred.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required