The best cesium clocks are good to ~one second every 300 million years, now surpassed by optical lattice clocks.
from
formatting link
: "Optical “lattice clocks,” which embed ultracold ytterbium or strontium atoms in a matrix of laser light — think of eggs resting in an egg carton — are also achieving stunning levels of performance. Because lattice clocks allow scientists to probe thousands of atoms at once, they can perform precision measurements much faster than single-ion clocks. This allows scientists to validate the clock performance over shorter time periods and perform precision studies of the clock frequencies. NIST’s lattice clocks would not have gained or lost a second had they started running at the Big Bang, roughly 13.8 billion years ago."
----
The 87Sr version of the optical lattice clock was used in the 'Quantum Sensor Breakthrough...' thread here, as well as:
formatting link
The NIST pages are intended for the general public and most papers on optical lattice clocks were behind paywalls in my quick search, but arXiv.org has some details of current research:
formatting link
Glen
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
Yes ? but in most cases, the effect is small enough to be ignored in typical...
J
joegwinn
Articles written by US Government entities like NIST cannot be copyrighted, and all such articles are available gratis on the NIST web site somewhere.
Joe
J
Jeff Liebermann
As far as I know, NIST publications were planned to be publicly available, but are not currently available to the great unwashed masses for free.
"The NIST Plan for Providing Public Access to Results of Federally Funded Research 2023 edition"
formatting link
"Public Access to NIST Research"
formatting link
J
joegwinn
It's always been hidden in plain sight, well preceeding 2023. The pdf files have names of the form "<integer>.pdf", with no hint as to what's inside.
Joe
J
john larkin
Given a narrow-bandwidth optical source, how does one divide it down to electronic frequencies?
Rubidium clocks use some optical-microwave interaction in the rubidium vapor itself.
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
M
Martin Brown
That is more a feature of the cursed content management system. You can usually find stuff published in the open literature on arXiv. Many academic journals encourage researchers to publish there (even ones that have a paywall on the main site).
P
Phil Hobbs
You heterodyne it with one line of a modelocked Ti:sapphire laser. The Hall-Haensch frequency comb works by broadening the pulse spectrum to an octave (by narrowing the pulses) and then locking a line on the high end to the second harmonic of one at the low end.
That gives all the lines the same absolute stability (i.e. in hertz) as the RF reference. That bit of extreme cleverness got them the 2005 Nobel prize, and well deserved it was. (I know both of them slightly.)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
B
Bill Sloman
This question has been asked here before. The 2005 Nobel prize in physics went to the people who developed this technique (amongst others).
formatting link
Whatever.
J
joegwinn
Optical Frequecy Combs, Tara Fortier et al, NIST, 2019 and subsequent.
See
formatting link
Joe
J
joegwinn
Yes, and the Nobel was well deserved. But Ti:sapphire lasers are still boat anchors even today.
What has happened since 2005 is that the Telecom industry has developed and miniaturized the needed components, developing robust and simple solutions.
Joe
J
joegwinn
All true, but NIST is a special case. By US law, US Government publications cannot be copyrighted (because taxpayers already paid for them), so NIST always has an archive where one can get a copy, even if the article is also published in a formal journal behind a paywall.
So a typical approach is to search for an article in the usual ways, and when the exact title is found, search for the title alone. This will also bring up the relevant NIST archive URL.
Joe
J
john larkin
OK, that's cool. A modelocked laser runs roughly 100 MHz but makes such narrow pulses that it has harmonics in the optical range.
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
G
Glen Walpert
Nice tip, thanks. One can also often obtain a copy of journal articles by contacting the lead author, which can work for papers not paid for by taxpayers, which is the case for some of the papers on optical lattice clocks and hyperfine transitions, of which there are at least 2 for 87Sr and at least 1 for Yt and Al. I decided I did not to try to figure out how they get millihertz linewidth at visible light frequencies when I got to the part about interaction with the nucleus allowing a doubly- prohibited state. The part about keeping an array of atoms at ~2 uK is easier to understand :-).
Glen
J
joegwinn
Welcome.
And Thorium clocks are coming soon.
Joe
B
Bill Sloman
I suppose if you chop up a laser beam into short pulses and squirt them into a cloud of Rubidium vapour, the exactly 6.834 682 610. 904 GHz harmonic component will get scattered by the rubidium vapour, and you will be able to pick up the scattered photons emitted at right angle to the beam.
Presumably there would be a phase shift on the detected pulses, which you might be able to use to lock the harmonic number precisely.
That would be the 68th harmonic of a laser beam pulsed at just above
100MHz, and kicking the pulse rate up or down by about 1.5% would also get you scattered photons. Phil's description isn't couched in those terms, so I guess that there's an easier way of doing it.
formatting link
describes a cruder system. which synthesises the 6.84 GHz signal directly and detects the slight drop (0.1%) in the output of a Rubidium discharge lamp when you hit the detector cell at exactly the resonant frequency.
Discharge lamps are crude beasts - the rubidium vapour doing the emission is hot, so the atoms are moving fast enough to Doppler shift the emissions. The description has a Rb-85 buffer gas cell between the discharge lamp and the Rb-85 gas detector cell which may tame that.
Trapping the atom in optical wells so that they aren't moving at all is clearly a superior (and much more complicated) system.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.