For lab use, an isolation transformer is cheap. It's also cheap insurance against unforeseen faults and the sorts of silly things one sometimes does in the lab while preoccupied with some other debugging problem....
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
like wires come adrift? Other than that, no matter what goes on in the psu the resistor chain keeps the output touch safe. I'll enclose the R chains and output terminals so nothing stray can touch the output end, or naer it.
I'm wondering whether its you or me that's missing something here. The unisolated output is entirely touch safe on both poles, you can stick your tongue on it or stick it across your head and no harm happens. This remains true whatever one connects the other pole to in a moment of foolishness. One would have to connect one pole to an external supply of over 1kV to reach the ratings of the R chain, and the other output terminal would still be completely touch safe.
The current limit Rs are a chain of Rs on each pole, so are safe against a whole series of componenet failures. Even if 60% of the parts fail short, its still all within ratings and touch safe.
I cant see any scenario in which isolation offers any increase in safety, in this particular case. And 85uA is a nonissue with RCDs/ GFCIs.
A sufficiently large resistance will make it safe to touch, assuming that the resistance is actually there when and where you touch it. It depends on your construction practices--handwired protos are flakier than PCBs, and e.g. a resistor string arranged in a loop is vulnerable to shorts. If you do it right, it'll be safe enough--as long as you include the effects of things like wristwatches and loops of fine solder drooping down into the circuitry while you're working on it.
The sort of stupid stuff that happens sometimes when you're cutting corners because you're in a hurry to do something else.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Right. I'll put a series of ?4 barriers at the end of the case with the R chains going thru them. Each barrier will have holes offset from the next etc. The barriers will be glued down for vibration resistance.
Yes, as long as the Rs dont all fail s/c. I'm ok with it, and I dont see isolation adding any safety in this instance. Even if they do, the input end current limiting will result in a fairly safe situaiton. It would take a series of faults for a shock to happen, making it safer than a normal isolated low v psu.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.