- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
-- And you?
-- And you?
mosfets.
-- That's a ridiculous claim which can easily be disproved by examining our posting histories.
mosfets.
Note how "Larkin-the-Narcissist" avoids a technical comment on my mutiple posts... what a fairy! ...Jim Thompson
[On the Road, in New York]-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
I tried it and found that there was an improvement, but not a "much better" improvement. Not really worth the effort of modifying the circuit.
How did you determine it was "much better"?
John S
mosfets.
Heck, you both screwed up. You a lot worse than Thompson, of course.
But maybe he'll defend your circuits.
John
Almost no DC error as V+ changes, and a much higher impedance load on the RC, hence on the output node.
The DC servo is of course a 2nd order loop, so its dynamics have to be considered. I think someone posted a 3rd order loop.
John
mosfets.
How would you know? You have killfiled me.
Idiot.
John
"Almost" and "much higher" doesn't cut it, John. Got some numbers? Or, as requested the LTSpice schematic to prove what you are asserting?
John S
I don't have to prove it. It's all obvious.
John
mosfets.
-- Trolling?
mosfets.
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCm5chXtLnI
-- Time wounds all heels.
Sno-o-o-o-ort! Consider that line stolen for personal use ;-) ...Jim Thompson
[On the Road, in New York]-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
mosfets.
Just curious as to where his loyalties, if any, lay.
John
Like most of JF's wisdom, it's an ancient cliche. And an oddly bizarre one here.
So, which of these two PNP feedback circuits do you think will work better, the common-base or the diffamp? Would you have to Spice both before you can decide?
Or are you going to pretend that you can't see this post?
John
mosfets.
-- Why is that any of your business?
circuit.
-- Apropos, actually, although you can't see why.
mosfets.
Really, you should try to be a little consistant. You and your bumchums are constantly discussing my personality, and playing passive-agressive lurker games, when you might talk about electronics. But you get all huffy when I examine your motives.
Thompson can
Odds favor (3), cluckwise.
Only (2) is good engineering.
John
circuit.
Given our relative ages, and electronic design activity, you seem to be getting wounded a lot faster than I am.
John
circuit.
-- Red herring non-sequitur, but if that's what you want to talk about, that's fine with me. On my end, ever since I started posting to USENET (15 or 20 years ago, IIRC) I've always posted schematics, either ASCIImatics (thanks, Steve. :-) or .pdf's and, in the last few years, since I've learned to use LTspice, LTspice .asc drawings and circuit lists to the text-based newsgroups in news:sci.electronics.* in order that my ideas for solutions to querants' requests for help could be tested by anyone interested. I've also posted the source code, as well as the compiled source, as .exe's, used to generate the results of many simulations as graphical plots released as executables generated by QB4.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.