Help with placement of filter inductor

I want to modify an ATX PSU for use with a project and am thinking of using a classic full-wave voltage doubler to get about -20V from the center-tapped 5V winding (I'll be using a PSU with separate 5V and 12V windings and the 12V winding will be used for another section of the project).

The rectified output will be further regulated with a linear series regulator, and the load will be of the order of a few tens of mAs. Please disregard other factors such as the voltage feedback circuit.

Where I need help is with how to place the filter inductor(s). Will the second of the two arrangements below be as effective as the first? Please view with monospaced font.

_______ D1 | |

---------||---L2--|------- GND D2

_______ D1 | |

---------||-----|------- GND D2

Reply to
pawihte
Loading thread data ...

John

Reply to
John Larkin

out

No, it's a double half wave:

: _______ : D1 | | : ---------||--+--L--+-----+-------+---- GND : D2

All three L's have to be independent.

Tim

Reply to
Tim Williams

Yes. But together it's effectively full-wave because they conduct on both half cycles of the AC input and the output ripple has twice the frequency of the source.

I think you drew D3 with the wrong polarity. D1 and D3 will just short the transformer when the upper terminal is negative. But why are D3 and D4 necessary (even if D3 is placed with the correct polarity)?

Reply to
pawihte

I understand that a second LC filter will further reduce ripple, but that isn't exactly the point of my question. It's whether placing an inductor in the common transformer terminal will adequately serve the same function as separate inductors in each half-wave section.

Reply to
pawihte

=A0out

Oops, good point. Yes, D3 has to point down. So D1-D4 could be a FWB, if they make them in high speed silicon.

D3 and D4 are required so the L's don't just flap in the wind. You'll see a waveform between -0.8V and +Vpk at the rectifier, if inductor current is continuous (which it should be).

BTW, you'll get 5V if you FWCT rectify both halves of the waveform together, which is how it's wired stock. Half wave gets half voltage, because the inductor's averaging it out. Half wave on the whole winding gets 5V again (at poor duty cycle), and FW doubler gets 10V (at poor duty cycle). So you won't actually get 20V out. To do that, you have to split the winding's CT, which I suppose isn't practical. (Then again, you said your 12V winding is being used for something else? Is it seperate? They usually use one monster winding with "+5", 0V and "-5" taps along it.)

At this point, the most economical (=3D lowest parts) solution involves stripping the 5V winding off, replacing it with a proper 20V winding and using a FWB, one choke and one filter cap (and maybe another LC filter for kicks). Or maybe you can use the 12V winding instead.

Oh, and the conventional cap-input rectifier won't work because it will explode your transistors. You can get away with it for small currents (under 1A??), but regulation is poor, depending on input voltage, not duty cycle.

Tim

Reply to
Tim Williams

Oops, I left in the middle-leg L, assuming he wanted to peak rectify. Your diagram is correct assuming he wants to average a pwm thing, except the D3 polarity.

In my defense, the morning caffeine has worn off and the chocolate supply is dangerously low.

I usually draw things with + up.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

A oops from my side. I'm so much more used to capacitor-input filtering that I forgot about how an L-C filter would behave with half wave.

Yes, as mentioned in my opening post, I have one with separate 5V and 12V windings.

I've been considering that option even before I realised my oversight about inductive filters with half wave. Taking out the

5V winding is too much hassle with the two halves of the core glued together. But since the turns/volt and the load are both small, it may be possible to just add a 20V winding.

Nope. It's committed. I want to use it to get 24V with a FW bridge rectifier using Schottky or fast-recovery PN diodes. The load will be about a couple of amps max.

That much I know. Thanks for your interest.

Reply to
pawihte

Excuses! Excuses! ;-) ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
             
              With Half My Brain Tied Behind My Back
              Still More Clever Than Mr.Prissy Pants
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Ouch, beaten by the rookie? ;-)

Tim

Reply to
Tim Williams

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.