Jamie's _are_ identical >:-} ...Jim Thompson
Jamie's _are_ identical >:-} ...Jim Thompson
Jim-out-of-touch-with-reality-Thompson gets it wrong again.
Jamie's genes, like Jim and mine, are very similar to those of a worm, but they aren't identical. Worms can't type, and Jamie clearly can.
We can't even claim that the genes that control intellectual development are significantly different between Jamie and Jim and I. He could have been dropped on his head as a child ...
Speaking from experience, I see.
As a matter of fact, I was dropped on my head at birth while my mother was getting up from the couch for the ride to the hospital. Guess I couldn't wait.
What's your excuse?
Jamie
,
but they aren't identical. Worms can't type, and Jamie clearly can.
t are significantly different between Jamie and Jim and I. He could have be en dropped on his head as a child ...
Why would you think that? Apart from the fact that you are too stupid to do joined up logic ...
as getting up from the couch for the ride to the hospital. Guess I couldn' t wait.
It wouldn't have been your choice.
For what? For not being as stupid as you are? You may find this inexcusable behaviour on my part - inconsiderately showing you up - but you'll just ha ve to learn to live with the fact that most of people who post here are cle verer than you. Sadly, learning is not your strong suit.
Ever hear the phrase;
" You're so stupid you don't know it" ?
Take plenty of time while you figure that one out, you'll need it.
Jamie
able behaviour on my part - inconsiderately showing you up - but you'll jus t have to learn to live with the fact that most of people who post here are cleverer than you. Sadly, learning is not your strong suit.
Since that is a paraphrase of what I just posted about you, that would coun t as a foolish question.
You are speaking from personal experience, though you probably don't know i t.
This thread is like you, old and senile.
Jamie
te:
xcusable behaviour on my part - inconsiderately showing you up - but you'll just have to learn to live with the fact that most of people who post here are cleverer than you. Sadly, learning is not your strong suit.
count as a foolish question.
ow it.
It started on the 7th May 2014. I was born in 1942. I'm old, but not yet ag ed or senile.
Threads are as good as the most recent post and can develop rather unpredic tably. Humans have rather more structure (you perhaps less than most).
As analogies go, this wasn't one of your better ones.
I wasn't trying to be my best on that one, I most likely posted that while I was sleeping behind the keyboard.
Goes to show you how much effort I need to put into it, compared to your attempts.
Jamie
Your "best" still earns failing grades.
"Needs more effort" would be the usual assessment. Sadly, no matter how much effort you seem to put into your postings, you still come across as a half-wit.
But for some reason you're always falling behind, so I conclude that if half-wit is your best then you must be in the gutter of the abyss by your standards.
Go fly a kite while you still have minimum cognition, so low, you can barely get those legs moving! At least the kite and a little hot air from that hole of yours, should keep you from falling flat on your face.
Jamie
Jamie
You do like your metaphors mixed -
Totally confused, in fact. But that's our Jamie.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required