fm_pic, a small RS232 controlled FM stereo transmitter with LCD display.

Cant you fake some sort of schematics in pcpaint?

That sheet is unreadable, although a lot of people might otherwise be interested......

Jan has be scolded for his schematics before.

We call them Big Indian Chief schematics.

If you were in elementary school in the USA, you would know Big Indian Tablets.

Still available, as Jan can attest to.

hamilton

Perhaps we could chip in to get Jan either a flatbed scanner or a tablet PC? :-)

I wouldn't scold him!

Even on t-shirts, it would appear!

-->

One can make T-shirts out of Jan's artwork too!

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

But, it would still be hard to read. Mikek

Sjouke Burry schrieb:

Hello,

using white paper and black indian ink pen might help...

Bye

Hey Jan, What is the reason that you post your projects and schematics? Mikek

He thinks he's impressing us. Another Larkin wanna-be :-) ...Jim Thompson

He wants to impress, but he does not want to give away any secrets. ;-)

hamilton

Some of us actually like talking about circuits, of course.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I'm impressed and I'm glad he does. I was hoping his answer would be that he wants to share so others can build them too. Then I was going to add, why the f*ck don't you produce a decent schematic. But he didn't answer, so I won't. Mikek

I do, too. But Jan's publications seem purposefully obfuscated. Occasionally I've been able to process one of his JPG's to a readable contrast, but it's too much trouble for the low outcome ;-)

I can't believe that Jan isn't able to produce better copy, so I have to conclude that it IS purposeful :-( ...Jim Thompson

"Jim Thompson" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

That's the reason for my angered response. I had actually started to make a readable schematic to post and then thought why should I waste my time. Mikek

(*)

Yup. Simply plonk Jan and get on with life.

(*) I have, from time-to-time, resorted to photographing a D-size drawing, but they come out far better than Jan's. Jan is apparently clueless about post-processing... although the Europeon brown toilet paper (?) he draws on probably complicates doing that ;-)

(?) Precursor to the development of the sand paper concept ;-) ...Jim Thompson

I haven't tried very hard to decipher them either. But at least they appear to resemble circuits, so the CER is higher.

obscure circuit no circuits

--------------- > ------------- biggish ego huge ego

(Not singling anyone out here--we can all form our own evaluations, and we're all very often mistaken about our own levels of ego involvement.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Certainly! But everything I post WORKS... works well, not just half-assed. And there are almost 150 posts to the SED page of my website, most of which are schematics (of course there _are_ some owl pictures :-). I've pretty much stopped posting attachments since many lurkers here can no longer access a binaries group.

AFAICR, only some of my old disco boom box and light show D-size scans (from blue prints) lack perfect readability, though none are as bad as Jan's. ...Jim Thompson

Like this "bad" copy...

or this...

You _can_ read these, can you not?

Jan posts crap, and Hobbs kisses up to Larkin ;-) ...Jim Thompson

SNR is an instantaneous measurement, not time-averaged. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs