Bill Sloman has posted enough nonsense here to let me be well aware of his intellectual defects. It is very clear why he gets no further than an interview for online work. Potential employers needing people to work in online teams will read his Usenet posts and click reject in seconds. It is probably the case that he does not care about this since it is clear that he prefers to be nasty to others over working with others and finding interesting work.
[snip garbage]
Most words don't have any precise meaning and the perceived meaning can vary wildly between different people. This is not to say that there are no words with a meaning which is hard to vary.
When precision is required in a subject such as Electronics then mathematical descriptions and statistical analysis of data may be used.
I don't recall Bill Sloman ever presenting any mathematical or statistical or other reasoning to support his claim that other people are/were not able to design ferrite cored or other inductors very well.
I suspect that Bill prefers the ambiguous nature of words because this makes it easier for him to feed his craving to be nasty to anyone whom he perceives to be intellectually inferior. He clearly takes much pleasure in doing this.
Perhaps Bill could let us know whether this book is worth reading and if not why not?
formatting link
If Bill does not wish to post anything to support his claims in a rigorous manner then I won't bother wasting my time with any further replies in this thread.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
B
Bill Sloman
I don't go out of my way to be offensive, but I don't sugar-coat my messages either. John Larkin expects to be flattered, and is offended when he isn't, to the point where he thinks he is being insulted, but this strikes me as an unusual attitude.
E
Edward Rawde
There's a big difference between "nothing dramatic" and "this book should be burned" or whatever it was you said in another post. What exactly is wrong with the book which should be burned? Apart from the asking price, which I wouldn't pay, but I might do the equivalent of having a quick look through the book before putting it back on the bookstore shelf.
B
Bill Sloman
As much as you design anything. The thermal contact pad under the coil that keep it from getting too hot was presumably optimised by the same kind of well-thought-out rigorous process.
Measuring the internal diameter with vernier calipers could give you a more easily archived reference.
Somebody more image-conscious might have machined (or 3D printed) a metal helix to more precisely specified dimensions. Something a bit bigger might have been easier to cool.
E
Edward Rawde
"Bill Sloman" snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org wrote in message news:10emofm$2cnh3$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me...
You don't seem to be interested in providing information which would lead to better products Bill. You seem to be much more interested in telling other people how stupid they are for only designing products which are "quite good enough".
The circuit below is not good enough in my view but you didn't seem to be able to handle any criticism of it some time ago.
What are Audiophiles going to think when they have to wait a whole second for the output level to stabilize? Not to mention the barely 60dB harmonic performance. These factors show that it is not well designed.
0.3683 FC = 0.5 EG = 0.69 XTI = 2 TEXT 200 -504 Left 2 ;R2 a,b,c, Vishay Beschlag ACAS06S0830372P1AT precision 10k resistor array \n R1a, R1b Maxim MAX5492LB10000+T
10K resistive divider in a SOT-23-5 package TEXT -2032 -560 Left 2 !.tran 0 10s 0s startup
E
Edward Rawde
Here's a rewrite of your reply below which would make me think you're being very helpful instead of being a complete moron.
[Begin rewrite]
How did you make sure that the thermal contact pad under the coil will keep the coil sufficiently cool?
Have you tried measuring the internal diameter with vernier calipers? This could give you a more easily archived reference.
Have you considered machining (or 3D printing) a metal helix to more precisely specified dimensions. Something a bit bigger might have been easier to cool.
[End rewrite]
J
john larkin
You obsess over JL and DT. I'm in good company.
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
J
john larkin
I don't think that you approve of engineering.
Thermal conductivity of the pad and an estimate of contact area. I wrote a program that helps with such thermal calculations.
There a lot of vias through the board to pipe heat from the inductor down into the baseplate. That adds theta too.
One of those gigantic multiphysics programs would be better, but I don't have one. It wouldn't be worth the effort to estimate coil temperature a few degrees better.
The gap-pads are at best around 7 w/m-K, and one can doubt their data sheets too. Pad theta is a strong function of compression, even more
3D fun. One could do math for months, or test things in an hour.
But the Pockels Cell driver works and is a few per cent of the volume of coventional MHz-KV designs.
How would you design such an inductor? Or such a pulser?
Size affects inductance!
The customer hasn't complained.
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
P
Phil Hobbs
That’s amazing. Over a microhenry, and no short-time capacitive dip, even on the 50-ps timescale.
Definitely a keeper!
I’ve been using multi-bank Litz wire induction coils for VLF, and discovered a very low noise (< 500 mK at room temperature) damping scheme that knocks down the Q=400 first resonance down to Q<0.7.
It only works on the first resonance, because the higher ones are less strongly coupled with the ends of the coil, and have an irreducible time delay.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
P
Phil Hobbs
I assumed that this was an old technique that nobody remembered, and found only one related patent: US 2,787,704 to Willem Wigger Boeiens and Jan Willem Tap of Philips.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
J
john larkin
It's easy to kill resonances, if you don't care much about Johnson noise.
formatting link
John Larkin Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center Lunatic Fringe Electronics
B
Bill Sloman
Edward Rawde's ides about which of my arguments might be nonsense do seem to be idiosyncratic.
Being 82 doesn't help.
I've not seen any indication that anybody ever has. And I doubt if they would have the effect he imagines. My CV has always listed my published critical comments in peer-reviewed journals - ten of the 13 publications I list - while I've not had anybody comment on them in an interview, one correspondent once said he thought that one of my comments was more informative than the - admittedly dire - paper I was commenting on.
This might be clear to Edward Rawde, but it doesn't happen to be true. In fact it is an absurd misrepresentation. In reality I spent quite a bit if my professional career supervising and directing junior engineers, and that does involve telling people that they have got stuff wrong and showing them how they can get it right. That's never painless but I could do it without making people hostile.
Most words have remarkably precise meanings (but that may depend on the context), and educated people know what they are. My wife was a remarkably high=powered specialist in human speech production and perception, and could spell out the evidence at length if you gave her the opportunity. Most phsycholinguists will, if you give them half a chance.
So you aren't completely crazy.
You need precise language to spell out what the mathematical description applies to.
I'd need access to a lot more information than I can find on-line to construct such a mathematical argument. And I haven't been arguing that other people can't design ferrite cored or other inductors very well. The problem is more dealing with the stray capacitances associated with the windings, and when John Larkin doesn't put them into his posted Spice models I've got all the evidence I need.
Edward Rawde does seem to project his own motivations onto other people. I do take pleasure in constructing a concise argument. I am less interested in the emotional reaction it will illicit. I know that John Larkin likes to be flattered, but I can't be bothered going to the trouble of shaping my comments on his posts into anything that might look flattering.
That is the 2010 second edition
formatting link
covers the 1990 first edition, which has eighteen chapters which cover a lot of ground. Chapter 10 on Ferrite Inductors and Transformers for Low Power Applications might be relevant here. It is a very expensive book.
So is E.C.Snelling's pile of nonsense. Publishers publish rubbish like that because they can rely on selling a few thousand to university libraries. even if nobody is going to bother to read them
Edward Rawde's idea of rigor is going to be just as idiosyncratic and self-serving as his other ideas.
B
Bill Sloman
That was E.C.Snellings book on "Soft Ferrites". It was a largely incoherent collection of detailed data, so poorly organised that I found it very difficult to find what I needed. If anything, exposure to the book left me more confused about the subject than I had been before dipped into it. Reading it from cover to cover would have been pointless.
B
Bill Sloman
You think that Donald Trump is good company? Jeffrey Epstein did too.
formatting link
B
Bill Sloman
Since it comes from the early part of a very long thread, and since I subsequently posted variations which performed a whole lot better, I seem to have been able to handle well-informed criticism pretty well.
JM was a whole lot more helpful than you were.You did post a variation of one of his circuits which managed to use eight transistors in the adjustable gain section - which he promptly cut down to four, and I subsequently increased to five which got us up to 150db suppression of the higher harmonics
They won't care. It is a reference sine wave generator.
The design did need improvement, and it got it. I'd posted it as a first try at an alternative to the FET gain control element. 60dB harmonic suppression is actually pretty good, but the FET approach could do much better. JM changed my design to get it to do much better. You didn't like his tantalum bead capacitors and found another way of reducing ripple feed-through, which he was able to simplify.
B
Bill Sloman
Oh, I do, but I don't think that what you do qualifies as engineering. Desperate improvisation comes closer to the mark.
You need to write a program to calculate that?
They just conduct heat. Heat pipes rely on evaporation and vapour transport, and can have a much lower thermal resistance, if you have the space to squeeze one in.
Then the manufacturer makes a slight change in the way they make their thermal pads, and you have to do it all again.
I'd find out what the Pockels cell needed, and go from there. Sometimes you can reorganise the parts that are being driven to make them easier to drive.
So does number of turns.
So it is good enough. Not necessarily as good as it might have been. Engineering has been defined as doing for one dollar what any damned fool could do for two.
Low volume niche markets rarely justify that kind of optimisation.
G
Gerhard Hoffmann
The press conference in this week in the Oral Office did put the icing on the cake, when one of his minions fainted.
He was the only one in in the room who did not care, let alone try to be helpful. He just turned away, his face saying "This is MY press conference! Can't you go elsewhere to die?!!! Scumbag.
So far for "good company".
Gerhard
B
Bill Sloman
That's electroplated silver coatings, and that fell out a favour a few years ago when it was realised that an electroplated layer of silver doesn't have the conductivity of solid silver, or even solid copper.
Someday somebody may used a pulsed laser to melt just the top micron of an electroplated silver layer, but it doesn't seem to have happened yet.
E
Edward Rawde
I can think of no reason why you would ever have seen any such indication. Any more than I can see which web pages you visit.
You must have lost that ability somewhere along the way.
Er when Liz said "I worked for a company that built its reputation on the R.F. inductors it designed; these factors were among the many problems they tackled."
Your reply was "Probably not very well."
So either we have an issue with the meaning of words or you're talking nonsense.
So why haven't you written and published your own book which is not a pile of nonsense?
E
Edward Rawde
That doesn't sound like a reason for burning it to me.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.