"Jim Thompson" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...
Check out the last spring in the yellow 'Coiled Diameters and Load' chart (the one that's 0.031 material thickness).
formatting link
It looks like exactly what I need. It's only 2" circumference and 1" wide. It'll give me my 20 lbs resistance over the displacement range I need. It'll only do that for 2500 cycles, but that will be acceptable.
Bob
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
Illumination! Thanks. I'm still a bit confused. I found the MC3357 Datasheet...
J
Jim Thompson
[snip]
Close, but no cigar.
Compressor, with storage tank large compared to cylinder volume... pressure rather than a stored vacuum.
...Jim Thompson
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Stormy on the East Coast today... due to Bush\'s failed policies.
B
BobW
That's right! The torsional spring garage doors provide a nearly constant force. Hmmmm....
Thanks.
Bob
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
J
J.A. Legris
bs
t. A
x).
=A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson
=A0 | =A0 =A0mens =A0 =A0 |
=A0 | =A0 =A0 et =A0 =A0 =A0|
=A0|
=A0 =A0 =A0 |
Stored vacuum? Like a bottle full of nothing?
Anyway, it sounds like a good idea to me - you'd need only a bit more than a square inch of piston area, some lubrication and a purge valve. K.I.S.S.
-- Joe
J
John Larkin
Shock absorbers keep nitrogen pressurized, at high pressure, for years. O-rings work. So why not vacuum?
Pressurizing with a liquid that had the right vapor pressure might work, too. Propane would be a candidate for testing maybe. I used to have a lot of fun with propane.
John
J
John Larkin
I just checked mine. The cable pays out of a narrow drum, one on each side. Looks like the payout radius falls as the cable feeds out, which may compensate for the curve of the torsion springs. Looks like sort of a 1/x function working against a 1-x function, which could be pretty good over a reasonable range of values.
John
J
Jim Thompson
I don't have a vacuum pump in my garage. I do have a compressor.
...Jim Thompson
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Stormy on the East Coast today... due to Bush\'s failed policies.
J
John Larkin
And vacuum is free. All you need is a check valve in the end of the cylinder, pressure operated or maybe mechanically operated by the piston travel. Something as simple as a tire valve stem, or a little ball thingie.
Stringing a racket, slow leaks wouldn't matter.
John
B
BobW
Hey! I do matter, and stop calling me a "slow leak". 8--)
It's an interesting problem I'm trying to solve. The final tie-off after the last string is tensioned involves a pull that tends to loosen the last section of tensioned string. So, I need to apply a counter force to the soon-to-be-closed knot while pulling on the string to tighten that knot. Also, the thing that attaches to the counter force device needs to become part of the racquet's knot since the knot will be closed around it. It's a tough problem to solve.
I want to be able to release the final string clamp (after tie off) and end up with zero tension loss. Without the standard technique (merely yanking back-and-forth to close the knot), the final string section is about a minor third lower in pitch (roughly 18%) than it should be, but it varies from string job to string job. It's all about minimizing the loss of tension with time (a big problem, imho).
Thanks for your and everyone's help.
Bob
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
R
Rich Grise
Me neither, but I concur. :-)
I found one for 19.8 lb:
formatting link
but it looks a little awkward to mount and stuff - apparently, you have to provide your own drum and housing and stuff.
Have Fun! Rich
R
Rich Grise
Betcha they don't! You're talking about the roll-up type door, right? When it's all up, flat against the ceiling, you can hold it in place with a fingertip.
But when it's down, it has to support the full weight of the door, give or take a few lb. In transit, from 1x to .01x door-weight, depending on how much of it is rolled up.
Hope This Helps! Rich
G
GregS
With the door up there is very little vertical weight, but I'm guessing it simalar to the spring system.
greg
B
Ben Jackson
The spring-based counterbalances for my windows use an interesting mechanism. It's a very stout spring that connects via a multi-stage block & tackle. The spring doesn't move very far because of the block so the force is fairly constant.
Ben Jackson AD7GD
http://www.ben.com/
J
Jim Thompson
Actually, What's _is_ wrong with a 20# weight, a cable and a pulley... pulley mounted on the edge of the stringing table??
...Jim Thompson
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
How do you pronounce Chrysler in Italian?... "Crapollatini"
B
BobW
That's what I'm currently using (a 20 lb sledge hammer). The placement of the pulley has to move as different strings are tied (mains vs crosses vs left/right side). The system works well. I'm just looking for something that makes the whole process easier to set up and move around as needed.
Bob
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
C
Clifford Heath
All the electronic wizards here have forgotten that the constant-force spring problem was solved hundreds of years ago - it's called a clock spring. The ability to produce a constant force over many rotations is fundamental to their purpose of keeping accurate time. Get a clock-spring from a decent-sized grandfather clock and attach the end of your racquet string on the circumference of the barrel.
A lever arm to rotate the barrel away from a stop would make it easy to load.
Clifford Heath
C
Carl Ijames
A short coilspring with one end fixed and the other at some fixed radius on an elliptical pulley, with the link to your string in the elliptical groove so the variation in pulley radius compensates for the variation in spring force. Use a large enough pulley so it only goes 1/4 turn or so to make it mechanically very simple - that would be a diameter of about 10" which is larger than your 2" cube but it is simple and should have great spring life :-). Multiple pulleys and/or gears would shrink it but now it's more expensive.
----- Regards, Carl Ijames
J
Jasen Betts
a 1.25 square inch piston with a vacuum behind it?
a DC motor fed the correct current working a rack and pinion?
a much longer spring? (you said "about")
an ordinary spring working a ramped pulley. ramped pulley as used on a compound bow:
formatting link
maybe a gas strut with a reservoir? (hmm that's my first idea again)
J
Jasen Betts
how about a motor-driven pulley with a clutch that slips at the force you want?
J
Jasen Betts
for garage doors they exploit the spring constant, it takes little force to to hold a door that is already up, as it's mostly supported by the tracks (if panel tilt) or axle (if roller) while one that is down is supported mostly by the spring.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.