Ah, OK.
I've seen numerous colors: yellow, red, ubiquitous_black, etc. At first, I was excited thinking there might be some color code that would make sorting out what's what easier. But, that didn't pan out.
So, a micrometer and selection of drill bits are my only real way of figuring out what the characteristics of a particular connector are.
Great tolerance there! :>
I am more interested in understanding how/why particular sizes are chosen as there doesn't seem to be any sense to it all.
It *seems* US firms have the barrel negative wrt center post. And, many far east firms the opposite.
Except when they aren't! :<
Yes, but the connectors are more fragile and harder to mate.
I've had to replace a number of jacks -- laptops, organs/"keyboards", etc. Usually devices that ither see lots of motion while in use
*or* have heavy cords dangling off the connection, unsupported. I've also encountered broken "wipers" in the jack (the contact that mates with the O.D.)I figured connectors with a *longer* and *wider* barrel might be more mechanically secure -- not just because of the increased size but, also, because they could be more readily "supported" by bits of the device into which they mate (even if that support is non-conductive)
I've also seen connectors that have quarter-turn locks built in. Insert and rotate to keep it from falling out (or being PULLED out)
I think the biggest risk, there, is a "plug" with a "too large" I.D. being *apparently* mated to one with the correct O.D. but smaller I.D. -- not a very robust connection (if at all!)
Exactly my thoughts (electrically). Let it feed anoher (set of) converters inside the device. More assurance that you have *all* the right supplies instead of HOPING to have the *one* right input supply.
Ah, hadn't thought of that! Hadn't *planned* on such a connector, though. Worth remembering for future encounters!
Yes. Looks sort of like the *mate* to the "original style" (hence my reason to call it "inverse")
Ahhhhh! Yes, that makes perfect sense! I'd simply assumed the outside of the barrel was one conductor (like it had been for the "original" plugs) and the pin was there just to "be different". The larger diameter and length that typically are associated with these being mechanical "enhancements" -- e.g., laptops see a fair bit of motion reflected to that connection!
OK. Allows the PS to be "identified" by the device using it. Presumably, could also ensure the supply isn't powered up if t is "wrong"!
Could also be used to power *down* the power supply when the device doesn't need it any longer!
Or, could just be there to sell "special powersupplies" :-(
Ah, OK. Clever. So, charge time depends on power supply and not something inherent in the device! Yes, that makes perfect sense!
And, of course, the truth is probably somewhere in between.
Thanks! That makes things a lot clearer! I will have to get a bright light and loupe and peer *in* the end of the plug. There should be a conductive surface there in addition to the pin.
(and, *probing* would obviously be something done with care lest "something" get shorted to the pin!)