Anyone want some paid work designing an amplifier?

I work for a company called Robinson's Jukeboxes Ltd. we design digital jukeboxes. At the moment we are looking to have a purpose built audio amp designed and thought there may be someone out there that wants the work that is capable of delivering what we want. Below is a spec:

2 or 4 channels, 4 would be better 100 watts per channel Must be small and really compact, size is an issue if we want to miniturize our jukeboxes must have tone control remote wired volume control input source from pc sound card line out mic input (pre-amped onboard) auxillary input for background music systems (line level input) jukebox audio to imediately cut out auxillary audio auxillaty audio to fade back in gradually after jukebox audio track ends echo facility for microphone microphone must have two operating modes: mode 1 anouncment mode (music volume automatically reduced to allow audible mic) mode 2 karaoke mode (music volume levels maintained)

This is a big job and our last project like this used philips op amp ic's, this job could use the same or mosfets etc.

This would be paid commissioned work.

Anyone interested can post here and i'll get back to them.

Thanks Steve

Robinson's Jukeboxes Ltd.

Reply to
steve
Loading thread data ...

You're looking at class D then. I'm not far from Leeds, but I think

200-400W sound output from a jukebox counts as a crime against humanity. Though if you had a whole lot of different versions of Cage's 4'33" on it, it could be tolerable.

Paul Burke

Reply to
Paul Burke

Don't forget the Karaoke input -- if a 100W / channel jukebox is a crime against humanity, what is 100W / channel Karaoke?

Take care with your terminology. Here's an amplifier that's described as "compact" -- is this what you meant?

formatting link

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google?  See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
Reply to
Tim Wescott

Yep, but I'd play this only on high efficiency speakers with at least

200W amplifiers so that I have enough headroom to not clip silence.
--
Thanks,
Fred.
Reply to
Fred Bartoli

"Watt inflation". Look at the teensy tiny little craptacular PC-clone amplified speakers that claim to be capable of 35 Watts when they sound tinny at their best sounding power level (which is realistically 0.1W).

Tim.

Reply to
Tim Shoppa

Geez, I get room-filling sound at less than that.

But then, these are vintage 12" woofers, too. ;-)

Tim

--
Deep Fryer: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
Reply to
Tim Williams

Hello Tim,

Yesterday I had the "pleasure" to listen to some kind of digital media player booster with speakers. It was the worst and most distorted sound I heard in decades yet the thing cost almost $200. A bullhorn was top notch HiFi gear compared to that junk.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Reply to
Joerg

I can certainly do this. Pro/commercial audio is my speciality. It won't be cheap though if that's what you were hoping !

Where exactly are you btw?

Graham

The email address in my headers works - feel free to contact me

Reply to
Eeyore

Just so I understand, when you say 4 channel, do you really mean 4 inputs and 4 outputs or do you mean 2 input channels with two sets of speakers on each channel?

Most of the PCs I find have just two audio outputs. I guess higher end sound cards will have 4 channel output. Is that what you expect this unit to connect to?

I would be interested in discussing this design. You can contact me at rick dot collins dot "the current year" at arius dot com. I can't seem to do enough to prevent spam!

Reply to
rickman

media

sound

top

Would that be a SONY system with the "unique" SONY brand class D amplifiers?

I recently listened to such a system and my conclusion was that they should have bitten the bullet and just paid the licences on the IPR and made a decent product instead of the D-I-Y (in the very worst sense) product they ended up with.

Reply to
Frithiof Andreas Jensen

Here is a bit more of the spec:

2 or 4 channels class d amp, 4 would be better, with analogue control

100 watts per channel, this is just a max value 50-70 watts rms or even less would be ok as long as quality and volume did not suffer.

Must be small and really compact, size is an issue if we want to miniturize our jukeboxes

must have tone controls

remote wired volume control

input source from pc sound card line out

mic input (pre-amped onboard)

auxillary input for background music systems (line level input)

jukebox audio to imediately cut out auxillary audio

auxillaty audio to fade back in gradually after jukebox audio track ends

echo facility for microphone

microphone must have two operating modes:

mode 1 anouncment mode (music volume automatically reduced to allow audible mic)

mode 2 karaoke mode (music volume levels maintained)

To clarify the 2 or four channels, a single stereo input is needed to the amp from the sound card. The amp should have to stereo channel so that four seperate mono channels can be controlled independently. This give the system the ability to control four seperate sound areas.

Steve

Reply to
steve

Just a couple things. Of course it depends on your application.

Automatic volume control is needed or perhaps ideal, if the source material is not level matched.

Mono music really sucks. Big gripe with me listening to bar music. Its cost more to run stereo, but then you have stereo.

Most bar speakers really suck, especially generic MTX (here in the US) boxes improperly designed and placed for the application.

greg

Reply to
GregS

Hello Frithiof Andreas,

I don't remember, could have been. I just decided that grandpa's old tube radio is a better performer. Even on the AM band :-)

Every time I listened to someone's iPod or MP3 gear I was not enthused. The sound just wasn't like that from even my car stereo. Oh well, I can live with MP3, wav, or whatever.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Reply to
Joerg

In message , dated Fri, 8 Sep

2006, GregS writes

It would rather compromise the karaoke ballad singers. Everything at the same volume.

... for the guy standing at the right spot, yes. For everyone else, not much.

People think audio is easy, and loudspeakers are easiest of all. None of it is true. I have a demo, using the same small drive unit in different boxes. it goes from tinny and strangled to 'Gosh, is that a 12 inch unit?' Oh, the boxes are made from corrugated cardboard (I can't remember the US English word). Of course, inch-thick high-density board, lead-lined and smoked over baobab wood shavings would sound better, but not as much improvement as getting the box size and shape right does.

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Reply to
John Woodgate

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.