Yes, I have done my homework on the WWVB signal. I am at the fringe of the 100 uV/m contour. I would very much like to see the signal on an oscilloscope when I test this. They have a receiver not far from here in Gaithersburg, MD and the signal is often strong during the day. So much so that I don't follow why they say there is this day/night signal strength fluctuation. It looks much more random to me.
The WWVB signal is not truly on-off keying. I believe they use a 10 dB modulation factor for the AM signal. This is close to on-off I agree. But they also phase modulate the signal and I will be demodulating both to see which one works best in my design.
The ADC in my design is truly one bit. It is an LVDS input on an FPGA. I looked at delta-sigma (or is it sigma-delta? ;) conversion and got code from the chip vendor for a simplistic implementation. I don't think I have the power budget for that and am using a much simpler 1 bit ADC at 4x the carrier rate. The bit stream is multiplied by quadrature carriers at 60 kHz and each stream summed for 1/30 of a second to implement what can be considered a DFT bin, a decimated FIR filter or a decimated down conversion; take your pick, they are all mathematically the same in this case because the sampling is synchronous to the carrier (or very close to synchronous).
What comes out the other end of this processing gains nearly 40 dB in SNR. My simulations show a recoverable signal when it is more than 20 dB below the noise.
Of course, I have not tested this yet on a real signal. I want to run some tests on the antenna and coupling transformer to verify the simulation. Then I will start working with the FPGA to see if I can make the LVDS input do what I want. I have ideas on how to bend digital circuits to do my bidding. This LVDS input is why I want as large a signal as possible from the antenna. With the high impedance input on the chip I should be able to boost the signal pretty well with just passive devices and signal processing.
The loop antenna is rather large. I would like to end up with something smaller. Once I get this working with a shielded loop antenna I will check out the ferrite core antennas. My understanding is that they don't produce as much signal.
I'm not sure how you came up with 2 Hz for the bandwidth. In this case the bandwidth is not just twice the bit rate. I believe the stated "system" bandwidth is around 5 Hz (from a 1995 paper prior to addition of the phase modulation). Regardless, I am sampling at 30 Hz and if I expect to see significant changes in phase or amplitude within one sample time, I need an appropriate bandwidth.
Even so, that is not the limiting factor. The limiting factor is the difficulty in holding tune with drift in passive component values. The Q can be raised by increasing the turns ratio on the transformer, but it becomes so sensitive to the parasitic capacitance that the sensitivity drops 10 dB with a 1 pF change.
Thanks. I will take a look at that.
I will be needing a time code simulator. I designed a commercial product that works with the IRIG-B time code which is similar. The functionality is not hard, it is just a matter of generating the data, encoding it into the modulation pattern, then impressing the carrier with the modulation. Working in an FPGA this sort of stuff is easy.
The trouble is if you make the same mistake in both the generator and receiver they work just fine in simulation, but not with other equipment. lol
I'll take a look at this link.
I might look into that. Certainly it can't hurt to get more input.