Yeah true, but for laboratory characterization?
I don't think I I've ever had a pulse generator that bad ;-)
Yeah true, but for laboratory characterization?
I don't think I I've ever had a pulse generator that bad ;-)
Another inconsistency. The data sheet shows some peaking in the AC curves, but the model doesn't ;-)
The ADI model, in spite of all the sections, looks like an ideal OpAmp.
...Jim Thompson
Change my OpAmp subcircuit params call to...
PARAMS: GBW=0.2 PM=60
Then it'll match the ADI model, but not the ADI data sheet >:-}
...Jim Thompson
Doesn't change much, AFAICS.
Comparison posted to a.b.s.e.
You changed it in the wrong place, see..
From: Jim Thompson Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Subject: Re: AD8218 model from SED, comparison of transient response, ADI and two JT versions. Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:57:20 -0700 Message-ID:
Study up on "params" in subcircuits >:-} ...Jim Thompson
Yes, I did.
That's my Berkeley 3f habits. no params in Berkeley 3.
Mea culpa.
Same as the ADI model, now.--
Yes,
"Design is the reverse of analysis" (R.D. Middlebrook)
Good! However, neither now match the data sheet regarding GBW. ...Jim Thompson
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required