absorbing reactance into series LC

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary

Translate This Thread From English to

Threaded View


Hi there,

In a filter I've designed, I have a series LC with additional
reactance, X, which gives a transmission zero in the filter.

How can I absorb the reactance into either the L or the C or both?

In a simple series LC, the reactance of the product at resonant
frequency is 0, so

jX (reactance) = jwL - j/wC = 0

from which you get

w^2 = 1/LC

however, with the additional reactance (which is frequency invariant -
i.e constant)

jX = X + jwL - j/wC = 0

the value of X, w, L and C are known.

I'm not entirely sure where i'm supposed to go with this though!

the value of reactance/susceptance in the series arm is -0.865
the value of inductance is 5.406H (this is normalised to one radian)
the value of capacitance is 0.18F (again normalised)
resonance is measured at 0.7130/1.404 (normalised, it's a band-pass
filter)

If you can help me make sense of this apparently easier algebra in
which i'm missing something, that would be great!

Phil


Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


On a sunny day (19 Feb 2007 05:50:53 -0800) it happened "Phil Newman"

Quoted text here. Click to load it

If your X is frequency invariant then it is a resistor.
If you have L C R in series (where R can be the resistance of the L),
then in resonance you will see R (real).
R also sets the Q factor of your series circuit, so its bandwidth.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RLC_circuit

Re: absorbing reactance into series LC



Quoted text here. Click to load it

thanks for your answer.

However, I beleive the job of the susceptance/reactance is to shift
the resonant frequency of the LC series from w = 1 to another
frequency, which denotes the transmission zero of the filter.

Phil


Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it


Series LC is not a bandpass, it's a bandstop...

* LTspice Simulation...
v1 1 0 ac 1 sin
.net V(1) V1 Rout10%K Rin10%K
C1 1 2 0.18
L1 2 0 5.406
.ac lin 1000 120m 200m
.plot ac S21(v1)
.end



Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it

But with an "R" (RLC) then it's a bandpass.

* LTspice Simulation...
v1 1 0 ac 1 sin
.net V(3) V1 Rout=1 Rin=1
C1 1 2 0.18
L1 2 3 5.406
R1 3 0 1
.ac lin 1000 120m 200m
.plot ac S21(v3)
.end


Re: absorbing reactance into series LC



Quoted text here. Click to load it


---
This is bandpass: (View in Courier)


      +--[L]--[C]--+
We've slightly trimmed the long signature. Click to see the full one.
Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


On a sunny day (Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:06:01 -0600) it happened John Fields
---
Quoted text here. Click to load it
We've slightly trimmed the long signature. Click to see the full one.
Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:44:32 GMT, Jan Panteltje

Quoted text here. Click to load it

---
At resonance there'll be an infinitely deep notch, so it'll short
the output of the generator and you'll get the bandstop function
We've slightly trimmed the long signature. Click to see the full one.
Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it

This is another bandpass: (View in Courier)

      +--------+--------+
      |        |        |
      |     +--+--+     |
      |     |     |     |
    [GEN]  [L]   [C]   [R]
      |     |     |     |
      |     +--+--+     |
      |        |        |
      +--------+--------+

This is another bandstop:

          +--[L]--+
          |       |
      +---+       +---+
      |   |       |   |
      |   +--[C]--+   |
    [GEN]            [R]
      |               |
      +---------------+

Cheers!
Rich


Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it

Series RLC in reference to gen.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

  Series LC shunt R in reference to gen.
Quoted text here. Click to load it





Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


On 19 Feb 2007 07:19:57 -0800, "Phil Newman"

Quoted text here. Click to load it

---

As Jan has pointed out already, In a series-resonant circuit like
this: (view in Courier)


We've slightly trimmed the long signature. Click to see the full one.
Re: absorbing reactance into series LC



Quoted text here. Click to load it

It's very difficult to understand the wording.
It is possible to drop the resonant frequency to say 0.5 Rads, using just a
resistance. Maybe that's what's wanted in this case.
john



--

Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it
To drop the res freq you increase the inductance and/or capacitance.
Increasing resistance increases the bandwidth not the resonant
(center) frequency. Reactance is XL=2*pi*F*L, XC=1/(2*pi*F*C), so
changing the reactance requires change L, C, or F.








Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it

Or pi


--
Gibbo

This email address isn't real.

Re: absorbing reactance into series LC



Quoted text here. Click to load it

---
or 2


--
JF

Re: absorbing reactance into series LC



Quoted text here. Click to load it
L),
Quoted text here. Click to load it
just a
Yes. But ... It's not the size of that resistor that's the problem, it's
knowing where to put it!.

As  example, for a parallel tuned circuit we always go ...
Fres=1/2*pi*root (L/C).   Fine, no problem!.

It's not correct. The true  formula is ...
Fres=1/2*pi* root(1/L*C-R^2/L^2). [a ballache to use so we don't]

But ... look how that coil resistance "R"  has slimed itself in and
ingratiated itself with the resonant frequency. (only rears it's head at
very very low Q values ). That "R" can become big enough to noticeably
poison the reactive effect of the inductor and drop the Fres.

Idle thought could  suggest maybe it's not  unreasonable that a series tuned
circuit, which is a kind of inversion of a parallel one, might for a similar
reason also suffer an "R" caused resonant frequency shift. I.e same lousy Q
and lower Fres.
In this case (as you note), the "R" can have no Fres effect if in series
with the inductor, so maybe it needs to go in ... with the ...  :)

(Dragged out I know but I'm constantly surprised at the number of ways a few
RCL components can be put together yet offer distinct features)
john



--

Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it


Don't think so..., resistor placement is for microwave this is
subsonic (0.160Hz),It's an impedance mismatch problem between stages,
just do a simple norton transform to match 'em up.



Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


Quoted text here. Click to load it

Thanks, how can I do this? my network theory isn't great.

basically, I've been using the equation Lw^2 + Xw + 1/C to find the
resonant frequency, and then using w^2 = 1/LC to calculate the new
values of L or C.

This works in terms of shifting the resonant frequency, but in terms
of the whole circuit really doesn't work very well.

How can I do these norton transforms?

Phil


Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


If I have a series LC (in a one-ohm circuit, everything normalised)

then S21 is resonates at w = 1 radian, and had magnitude of 0dB at w =
1.  S11 has magnitude of -infinite dB (or -80dB as ADS doesn't
interpolate that far!)

If i put in my frequency invariant susceptance/reactance which isn't a
resistor, it is just constant reactance, then this shifts the resonant
freqency from w = 1 to w = 1.15 (eg)

S21 still resonates at a level of 0dB and S11 and -infinite dB.



Re: absorbing reactance into series LC


my susceptance/reactance is modelled by a chain ABCD matrix

-1    -jB

 0      -1



Site Timeline