a good six layer PCB stack-up recommendation but...

Feb 24, 2010 2 Replies

formatting link



on page 8, figure 8, why it's not a symmetrical stack-up? why there is a solid line in between L3/L4


and what's the exact thickness between L3 and L4?

I calculated as follows: solder mask Er =3D 3.3 / 0.7 mil FR4 Er=3D4.2.

z L3 =3D 50+ z L4 =3D 50+ not bad for 60 ohm trace...

The edit job turning a copy of figure 7 into figure 8 was botched.

Ask your fabricator for the tolerance you will get if you specify the suggested 30 mils, or whatever you actually specify.

So you calculate the same impedance for the 5 mil and the 6.5 mil dielectric? While there is no reason you can't use different trace widths on these layers to actually get the same impedances (within manufacturing tolerance), there is no reason to make this layout asymetrical either.

You should take these app note stackups as suggested ideas to consider during your design, not as actual usable designs.

For really good info on how the details of your board design affect your signal integrity, subscribe to the signal integrity mail list, search the archives for book recommendations, and read a few.

---------

To subscribe to si-list: snipped-for-privacy@freelists.org with 'subscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:

formatting link

For help: snipped-for-privacy@freelists.org with 'help' in the Subject field

List technical documents are available at:

formatting link

List archives are viewable at:

formatting link
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
formatting link

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required