Not stupid for the circuit, that's pretty basic. What's stupid is this circuit's mode of operation, which given his recent reliance on device parameters for certain functions, should be amusing.
Note it won't work with a bipolar gate driver.
Should work 4-15V input.
Also suitable for generic inverter purposes... change feedback to Vout instead for regulated buck, etc. 'Course, then you can work against some stupid cap's ESR, which isn't as much fun as this is.
Tim
--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
At least I'm not competing with Al Gore for selling obfuscation.
AND, I'm not ignorant enough to think living in San Fransicko, Californica, is a good thing.
GFY, John, You're getting REALLY boring.
Stop showing us boxes, and start showing schematics that meet good engineering practice. Be prepared to defend them :-) ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy
I rely on device parameters that I can rely on. This circuit, maybe not so much. But Rds(on) is specified about as well as beta is, wouldn't you say?
I don't stock a single resistor value, but I do find I use an awful lot of
1k, 4.7k and 10k. There's quite a lot you can do with just those three. Hard to do much without other values though.
The last major project I designed worked the first time, requiring only minor adjustments in the control loops. And it spans three (smallish) boards.
None of these products are remarkable. They are all well within the known laws of physics. Possible ways to design them are immediately obvious. Actual implementation would take longer to work out, and the complete design, a few months more.
The only thing that might be impressive about them are the tedious refinements (the kind of thing Tektronix was expert at, making things like your handsome square wave), and repetition in scale, which people find amusing (like those entertaining domino videos), but which is mindless work putting together. 256 input ADC? Sure, that's easy. It takes a lot of op-amps and big board space to hold everything, but each channel is just as boring as the next, just filters and switches and whatnot.
The data processing that brings everything together should be impressive, if not for already being pedestrian today. (It's a sad age when billions of transistors, and their programming, can be considered boring.) Just slap in an FPGA, wave the magic VHDL wand, and there's your bus interface. Microcontrollers, FPGAs -- computers in general, are tedious to make (>1G transistors) and tedious to program (>10k LOC). They are neither hard to make nor difficult to program.
It's too bad all that tedium has to be done by human hands, so much of it could be so easily written automatically. Then, there would actually be time to do impressive things. Too bad the "software design software" required is somewhat more complicated than anything anyone can understand today. If it's true that "software design software" can never design itself, then since humans are software writers, they will certainly never be able to write one.
Tim
--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
Why are you going down this path? I would rather design an easy product that sells in which I have market share , than a hard product that never sells.
I am not saying that Larkins designs are easy or hard, I am saying that if you want to flame someone learn to pick the right things to flame about. Clearly the guy has a company that sells products and employs people. What about that is flameworthy? Seriously, at your age you should be asking the guy questions about his designs and trying to learn something from him. I sense that you are making good progress in your electronics , but you are going to come out on the short end of a flame war when you take sides with either player when they both are credible and 30 + years your senior (in experience)
Datasheets have numbers, so I use them. Some jfets have 12:1 Idss specs; some bipolars are binned to below 2:1 beta spread. Sometimes all that matters is a min or a max. Some parts, like tantalum caps, can explode at half their rated voltage. Some parts, like ceramic caps, can lose half their capacitance at rated voltage.
Once in a while I cheat in one direction or the other, but that has to be done very carefully, and only if there's a real payoff. But mindlessly following a rule of thumb that someone taught you 40 years ago is restrictive.
(Actually, I still do one of those: I don't like to leave bases open, even when the resulting leakage is demonstrably trivial.)
That's not the point; few people design electronics (or music, or pastries) that are outside the laws of physics. The point of electronics design is to invent new architectures to solve new problems, and then to make them work.
Physicists are notoriously bad circuit designers. Chemists are worse.
Well, there was the faster-than-light coax running around the NG a couple of years ago. ...and if you pop over to sci.electronics.basics, there's oodles of the stuff from Cahill. ;-)
Tim is obviously on the autistic spectrum; possibly quite a few wavelengths into the spectrum. Look at his website. At his age he should be chasing nubile women. He has his whole life ahead of him to heat up pipes with coils.
The hell. He should be getting drunk and going clubbing every Friday. The hell with electronics, it'll still be here in ten years. Youth? Not so much.
In the same way the space shuttle was spec'd by a roomful of geniuses as just a big bus with wings for flying to the moon. Except it couldn't.
I know what's in some of Larkin's stuff--I've seen schematics. Not trivial, and not obvious. All of it workmanlike, some of it is, honestly, brilliant.
As if krw's output had any redeeming social - or any other - value. His politics are right wing stupid, and he has nothing to say about circuit design.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.