Current mode feedback works as expected to equalize ONLY when the feedback is linear. Various components in the feedback chain have compliance limits. In short, there are many conditions in which your feedback signal is limiting, and you can't count on it to drive the power stage back into dc balance. One partial remedy is to use a completely separate power supply to provide bias for the controller chip itself. This approach eliminates most, but not all, of the situations in which the flux-walking problem can occur. Some designers include an air gap in the transformer to make it more tolerant. --Paul Mathews
Spehro Pefhany wrote: > To make a battery charger circuit that will run from a 12VDC > regulated supply and produce (up to) 60V at 3-4A, what SMPS topology > would be recommended? I've gotten the suggestion of a flyback, but > 240W seems a bit on the high side for that. >
The absolute simplest power control scheme would be hysteretic current control of the the boost topology, which can be paralleled in constant current mode. This brings up that 20-60V output at 0.1-4A output current. You need to translate this to constant current mode programmable from IL->IU with what compliance, and float charge constant voltage programmable from VL->VU over what current range. Usually a table or graph required here. That is the easy part. The hard part is tying in all the charging algorithms and fault protection as a function of battery chemistry. TI has that BQXXXX series of multi-chemistry battery charging control IC's. You're going to need something like that as either the finished IC or embedded/emulated in a PIC controller or something. The finished circuit will be simple enough, but the design effort will be non-trivial.
I'm really not worried about the algorithm.. it's less than a page of C to implement the most complex NiMH algorithm used by chip makers, including recovery from over-discharge, which the present micro-based "commercial" units don't properly implement. The battery manufacturers also publish (somewhat incomplete) information which is useful for charge termination parameters for a given cell.
Iout = f(Vcell(t), t, T(t), ncells)
Agreed. But not a crazy amount of work.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Yes, Henry, thanks. I'm going to look at your German patent over breakfast. ;-)
German Patent office-- Fusball & Technik?
formatting link
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
If you can't get OTS then the best topology is the Boost, similar to a flyback but no custom transformer, the push pull and forward converters have discontinuous input current and custom transformers. Any resonate topology is not viable at low voltages. Your 25A input current is better handled with two interleaved boost channels 180D out of phase. The UCC2820 will handle all the drive functions at about 200KHz PWM.
formatting link
If the input inductors are still two big, go to three or four channels at
120D each, the inductors would be OTS. This would cut your output storage caps in half. It is always a good idea to use more silicon and spread the heat. At 90% efficiency, that is 27 watts of power loss. This can be increased to about 93% with synchronous rectifiers for the high side diodes.
So long as a glitch doesn't cause smoke, I'd be happy to do so.
Given the voltage range, I'm not sure about the boost converter topology though. I can't go much under 12V without running into problems at the low end with a simple boost converter. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Thanks very much, Harry, we'll take a close look at doing just that.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
I did a 12V car battery, to 50V at 3Amps boost, for a stepper motor supply. Uses an ETD44 with 10 turns of 6mm tri-rated. Single BUKxxx (can't read it) with 2"x3" heatsink. PWM gate drive and seperate current sense resistor and comparitor to kill the gate on any overcurrent. Took about an hour to design and build. Sadly, this was before I learned that these things are far too complicated to be designed so casually and I lost confidence. Still running after 6 years though.
I need to do something casual like that sometime soon, to drive a servo'd rcar rooftop antenna rotator... so if you could casually answer a couple of questions I'd appreciate it.
Did you do a boost, flyback or some other topology?
[Sounds interesting project!] 'Tis a standard 'Boost' ie, Supply > Inductor > Fet > deck. Best I remember it, is that "Tri-rated" is multistand wire with insulation rated for a working temperature range up to 105 degC and has some approval details printed along it's length. (as cable, nothing special).
The other week and suspicious of the size of some "10mm^2 tri rate", I miked up the cores, counted 'em and did the sums. Turns out it was 7mm^2. Looks like the world Copper shortage is having an effect. Got to keep stuff casual as SMPS topics seem to intrude on a lot of jealously protected turf and delicate egos. Hence It'd be tantamount to iconoclasm to dare mention how straightforward my recent design was for a customer's 1400W boost :)
Thanks John. I'm not familiar with working at these power levels. Though I think I understand most of the theory, I'm sure in practise that learning layout skills will be interesting.
. We go transmitter-hunting once a month. A number of teams have power-rotated antennas with all kinds of DSP hooked up to the RSSI, but when you get an intermittent transmitter they often miss the pulse simply because they're pointing the wrong way. Hand-rotated antennas work well, but need to be smaller in size.
My notion is to build a rotator that can hunt and circle near a manual (or maybe even automatically detected) likely direction, potentially synchronizing with a periodically-pulsing transmitter. Computer control means it can be made not to wind up the cable (no more than one turn each way), so no slip-ring coupling is needed, and compass information from the GPS means it'll keep on target as the car turns corners. I have a nice 18:1 worm-drive gearbox with a 1" output shaft, and a powerful DC servomotor from an old HP 7978 tape drive - about
2Kg, driven by a linear amp from +-45V supplies! I'll use PWM not the linear, but just need more than 12V.
When you get close, you jump out and run with a hand-held Yagi+sniffer. One of the local guys builds this nice bit of kit: . This is the device that requires the dual-gate GaAs-FET I was asking about recently, for its combination of sensitivity, low noise performance, and huge dynamic range.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.