--
(c+d)", 0.800
c" 0.800 1.56
0.750 1.67 -1.63 1.88 -1.83 1.83 1.88 -1.83 1.83 3.74 2.03 4.16 11 "a 4.16 17 2.03 4.16 1 "a+b","(a+b) + (c+d)",
d))", 0.500
d", 0.400 3.13
0.400 3.13 -3.05 3.75 -3.66 3.66 3.75 -3.66 3.66 7.49 6 4.88 9.98 10 "(a+b) 12.48 16 "(a) + 12.48 18 "a + (b | 12.48I don't know why, but the table is totally mangled in pan.
?-(
In his OP the column alignment was done with a mixture of spaces and tabs (which are viewer-dependent). Then in your reply it is line wrapped too.
If you can still see the OP you could try turning off line wrapping and fiddling with the tab width.
It is because the tab-char to the number og space-chars is not unique.
Some editor, mail clients, word process. might use e.g. 4space:1tab or
4space:1tab.It is better that the sender only use space character - combined with a fixed char width font.
/Glenn
It is because the tab-char to the number of space-chars is not unique.
Some editor, mail clients, word process. might use e.g. 4space:1tab or
8space:1tab.It is better that the sender only use space character - combined with a fixed char width font.
/Glenn
View - Wrap article body - make sure it's OFF.
Displays fine in pan here...
Thanks Fred, that untrashed it.
?-)
Just leafing tghrough a Venkel catalog, they have surfmount 0.01%, 5 PPM resistors.
Without a four point Kelvin connection, there is no way in hell you can get 0.01 percent in-circuit accuracy.
For a 10K resistor, 0.01 per cent is a full ohm. That's easy on a PC board.
I just designed a laser driver that uses a 2-wire, surface mount, 10 milliohm sense resistor. At 150 amps, I'm seeing less than a 1% error on the measured current.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required