Silly. We have no colonies, not even in Europe where we had absolute military domination not long ago. We pay market prices for everything. We export aid, wealth, and jobs to places that, frankly, need them a lot worse than we do. Puerto Rico and other affiliates can vote to become fully independent if they want to. The US doesn't want to dominate the world, we want to spread wealth and democracy. What's wrong with that?
Describing Noam Chomsky as a "scholar" is enough to make a mockery of that site. I bet you buy his books, with the money you don't spend on actually helping people.
America's quest for world domination? By that you must mean fast- food and the internet right?
Hell in a handbasket? Heck, the deficit's down another $50 billion, despite all the money we're dumping into Iraq. The economy's been so strong that revenues are outstripping even Congress' abilty to spend them. (Don't expect that to last...neither the boom, nor Congress' restraint.)
Certainly we do, if you consider what the murderous-types would do once unleashed. We owe the Iraqis better than that.
Remember, by and large they're not attacking Americans, they're not fighting another army representing a different political point of view, they're attacking their own civilians. That's nasty.
It claims to be representative. I'm not convinced any more. Hang on, I'm convinced it's not.
Fine by me. It's not a crime to suggest that some countries may not be entirely ready for it though ( I know an Indian businessman who thinks democracy in India is a farce for example ).
Never heard of that. The Swiss are awfully quiet from here.
The UK parliamentary thing has always confused me. Calling early elections, forming a government, shadow ministries, dissolving governments, all that. What if something important happens while there is no government?
" Through referenda, citizens may challenge any law voted by federal parliament and through initiatives introduce amendments to the federal constitution, making Switzerland a direct democracy. "
Fixed terms would be better I think. No possibility of holding a snap election to suit events.
Shadow Ministers not ministries.
there
The existing incumbents deal with it. I've always though it funny that your newly elected president has to wait a couple of months to take office btw !
California works like that, too. There have been a number of popular referenda in recent years that ran contrary to what the Legislature wanted, like Prop 13 (property tax reduction) and Prop 209 (forbidding most state institutions from taking race into account.)
to suit
there
newly
It does give him a while to get organized, find some cabinet members, stuff like that. Not to mention recover from the election. Seems like a good idea to me.
And it gives the outgoing President and his wife time to steal furniture and pardon a bunch of criminals before he leaves.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.