Cell phone noise into opamps

How low do you want? Have a look at AD745 : 3nV/rtHz@10kHz and 5.5nV/rtHz@10Hz typ. (4 and 10 max) It's the only really low noise one I know of. But be warned when seeing the package size. And check the footprint, I got burned on this one: they just say soic16(R) but it's a _wide_ package. Ouch...

--
Thanks,
Fred.
Reply to
Fred Bartoli
Loading thread data ...

Thanks. Yes, that's one large amp. We now have 8-TSSOP in there and it might not fit.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

Mail me the schematic and layout, and I'll do some hand-waving.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

The story is that B-B had a lot of old production test sets that have started to fail, and they can't get parts to fix them, and it will take a while to design new ones.

TI tech support has been atrocious lately. I suppose it's all backed up.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

I've heard such rumors as well. What's so difficult about a test set? And why do they suddenly fail? Somehow it sounds like a management problem. I mean, it's been months now if not a year.

Lately I have become a bit more bold there. If a part is hard to get or support isn't forthcoming it's outta here. Usually for good or at least for a long, long time. Even if it has to be done discrete, so be it.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

Then I'll get shot :-)

I already did the convincing session (thou shalt not split grounds etc.). The layout is going to be pretty good and with some extra shield cans and stuff I am sure we can make it work. But no matter how much filtering there comes a point where something without a b-e junction would be kind of nice. This is an app where a cell phone right next to the unit is something to be reckoned with. Almost like good ole mil stuff.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

Just an observation:

These tiny Bluetooth headsets seem to get away with this sort of stuff. I have one which happily works without any audible interference with the cell phone sending Bluetooth data , and of course its own radiation at 8-900 MHz, with the phone effectively right on top of the earpiece. And its all in a plastic moulding.

--
Regards,

Adrian Jansen           adrianjansen at internode dot on dot net
Design Engineer         J & K Micro Systems
Microcomputer solutions for industrial control
Note reply address is invalid, convert address above to machine form.
Reply to
Adrian Jansen

It's ok for simple audio stuff. But we have to extricate signals in the uV region.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

Reply to
bill.sloman

Digikey: Only 31 OPA627 left, in the classy TO can. Nice for a retro project but don't count on building more than 31 units. Sometimes I have the impression the time you were talking about has come. Lots of BB parts shortages.

The OPA656 is around 80nV/rtHz at 10Hz or as Archie Bunker would have put it, lousay.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

Adrian Jansen snipped-for-privacy@qq.vv.net posted to sci.electronics.design:

I saw your frequencies and thought "that's not right". So i googled and the correct frequencies are 2400 to 2500 MHz pretty much worldwide. Right there with 802.11b/g network equipment.

Reply to
JosephKK

Joerg snipped-for-privacy@removethispacbell.net posted to sci.electronics.design:

Given the recent purchase it sounds like an inherited management oops. Just the same, test sets should not be failing.

Reply to
JosephKK

Joerg a écrit :

Oh, you can find consolation by looking at some CMOS opamp datasheet.

--
Thanks,
Fred.
Reply to
Fred Bartoli

Hi Joerg

Does the circuit run on a single supply ? Try dual ! and separate 0V from shielding ground by a few Ohms.

Robert

Reply to
Bob Woodward

It has dual supplies. Uncoupling anyb of the grounds makes things a lot worse, pretty much what I've always seen. That's usually because the source cannot be truly differential.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

datasheets:

formatting link

Just wondering, are the cell phones in question GSM T-Mobile or Cingular/AT&T phones?

Michael

Reply to
mrdarrett

datasheets:

formatting link

We tried a lot of them and it was all over the map. Mostly CDMA I guess, at least none was from T-Mobile. Mine (Nokia 2115i on VirginMobile which uses the Sprint Net) was actually the most docile. A Verizon one really hit hard, so did a BlackBerry. But it'll depend on how far the next tower is and thus the ouput power it sets itself to.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

datasheets:

formatting link

Ah, ok. I thought the interference was predominantly from GSM phones.

formatting link

"It is a common occurrence for a nearby GSM handset to induce a "dit, dit di-dit, dit di-dit, dit di-dit" output on PA's, wireless microphones, home stereo systems, televisions, computers, cordless phones, and personal music devices."

I had thought this was our car stereo going bad; knowing this now, it was most likely my wife's GSM phone.

Regards,

Michael

Reply to
mrdarrett

datasheets:

formatting link

Yep, just had a thread in a German NG. Dits and grumbles in the stereo ever hour or so. One of the guys asked whether they had plopped the cell phone down anywhere close. Answer: Uhm, ah, well, yes! Problem solved.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

I'd have thought *everyone* over there knew about that. They've been exclusively GSM for years in Europe.

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
                                             (Stephen Leacock)
Reply to
Fred Abse

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.