Twisted Pair

Anyone have a decent Spice model for a twisted pair... lossy, not the ideal model in circulation? ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson
Loading thread data ...

On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 10:41:37 -0700, Jim Thompson Gave us:

using cat 5e specs and hardware and calling it cat 6 would yield lossy operation at the upper end.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

There's enormous variation in twisted pairs, even among "standard" things like compliant CAT5 and CAT6 cables.

The Spice lossy delay line implements The Telegrapher's Equation, but ignores skin loss variation with frequency. The best thing to usually do is get a chunk of the actual cable of the expected length and note its step response on a scope, then fiddle the Spice lossy line parameters to match. An extra RC or two sometimes helps fine-tune the model to reality.

Multi-pair cables, like CAT5/6, can be expected to have various amounts of crosstalk and pair delay skews, too.

formatting link

formatting link

formatting link

Simple RC equalization helps, if the cables are repeatable.

--
John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

Thanks! Good collection of data there in your examples!

I do remember doing compensation BC (before CAD) using a pre-emphasis leading-edge pulse... on a thousand foot chunk ;-)

I'll look at how PSpice does their lossy T-line, and maybe I can adapt. I did some lecturing on skin-effect modeling for Intel eons ago... I'll review my notes. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.