LTC switcher, PADS

Mar 25, 2009 21 Replies

OK, we are getting tired of messing around with switcher chips, inductors, schottkies, cap ESRs, all that. So we're going to start using these gadgets



formatting link



which seem to be very cool dudes. We're running the eval board and it looks very clean.



But the package is a weird land-grid thing. LTC has some pcb parts files, but we can't seem to get them to work with PADS.



formatting link



So, does anybody have a PADS part file, preferably ascii, for this gadget? If not, we'll have to craete the damned thing ourselves.



Any other experience using these?



John



Oh man, switchers out of a can? Where's the sportsmanship? To me that always feels like wine out of a square box ...

[...]
Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

formatting link

To continue the food-and-wine analogy, we have other fish to fry.

Reminds me of the James Bond movie. He's in the dining car of a train, ordering dinner with a fellow British spy. The other guy orders fish and red wine, so James shoots him, knowing him to be an impostor.

John

If you want to still go to the race track, if only for watching Yugos or Minis race, National has had their Simple Switchers ICs for years now. Some of the magnetiocs manufacturers even make "drop in" inductors to match.

We mainly use Vicor power modules around here, and with a recent design, we're seeing exactly what Terry Givens had suggested we would: To actually get the rated power out of the modules requires far more heatsinking and air flow than one would expect. @#$!@#

On a sunny day (Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:40:01 -0700) it happened John Larkin wrote in :

formatting link

Yea, he should have ordered 'fish and chips'.

formatting link

No, bangers and pohtah or bittah :-)

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

Same for many Maxim parts. Which I won't use :-)

At the end of the day I am always glad when I am done with another switcher design and it's all nice and cool. Don't know about Vicor but one of the issues I see with many commercial designs is that they try to get away with the smallest magnetics possible and then that gets hot.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

My suspicion is that Vicor has felt the pressure to produce smaller modules (or more power in the same-sized modules), and it appears that the response has been more in terms of designing really good thermal mechanics rather than changing the electrical design with the aim of improving actual efficiency.

We ended up with a pair of those long, skinny fans (two rotors in cascade internally) that scream like banshees given the high RPMs they run at. But, it does work, and Vicor modules do meet their data sheet specs... just barely.

I'd like to try out some Synqor modules one of these days... but since we don't typically have cost (or noise!) as driving factors in designs, so since we've been using Vicor modules for years now it's hard to overcome the inertia.

---Joel

I'd seriously look into other solutions. High RPM fans are just a problem waiting to happen. One fine day the noise will miraculously change or disappear ... tssssst ... poof.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

We've used LT's LTM4601 series for quite a while. They work well - especially if you're tight on space and height.

Bob

== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==

That's as far as I've made it with the LTM8021 kit. BTW, this site might come in handy for the eval info:

formatting link

formatting link

LOL ! It surprised me too. One for the bookmarks file I reckon.

Graham

Is it that difficult in PADS ? I rarely find 'standard' pcb footprints entirely satisfactory anyway and often create my own ( or the client does ) to suit their assembly techniques etc.

Graham

formatting link

I had some bitter for the time in ages last night at a local pub with a micro-brewery. It was very hoppy and had almost a grapefruit after-taste. Very nice too. Slight hangover in the morning though. My usual poison won't do that.

Graham

Talking of which, what's happened to Terry ? Haven't seen him here in ages.

Graham

barely.

Absolutely. I loathe those tiny CPU cooler fans for example. If the load is variable, it's worth having a speed control to reduce noise and extend lifetime.

Graham

formatting link

micro-brewery.

Slight

The only truly English ale we can get here is Tadcaster. Unless you go to the Fox and Goose in Sacramento where everything is English.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

I've done PCBs for these things in another package. Shouldn't be any different than making a BGA. For their LGA118 package, I used 30 mil square pads with 34 mil square solder mask opening. You'll need to use a 25mil square pad. Solder paste stencil opening was 29mil square. In the LT notes they say don't use soldermask defined pads, yet they also say to use pours under the input, output, and ground areas. I ended up using a pour with the equivalent of solder mask defined pads under those areas. Everything worked out fine. I talked to LT about how to deal with solder mask defined pads in the poured areas and they said you must break their rules and use solder mask defined pads in the pour areas. I made pin-A1 square and didn't use the funny chamferred pad. If you haven't figured this out, do the part in inches (mils) as that is the base units for this part.

BTW, I really like these parts. It's expensive, but they do work well and you only have one part to worry about regarding what voltage you're going to get. That's easy to test with an ohm meter before you fire up the thing and potentially fry your $500 FPGA.

Mark

formatting link

These are really remarkable parts. LT spent a lot of time with thermal problems and other headaches, but the node capacitances are all less since it is so small and that makes them really clean-- little overshoot and such. You can also get a buck-boost version that hooks to external FETs and inductor and get 98% efficiency.

Paul

formatting link

and other headaches, but the node capacitances are all less since it is so small and that makes them really clean-- little overshoot and such. You can also get a buck-boost version that hooks to external FETs and inductor and get 98% efficiency.

We're seeing about 25 mv p-p noise at the output, which is easily filterable to

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required