We keep running into the requirement to turn +12 or +5 volts into 3.3,
LTM4615 looks interesting, a bit expensive but very small.
And other ideas?
John
.
How about LT3507?
LT3564 seems to get a lot of switcher into a small package.
I haven't been able to find a way to do it with either a PIC or a 555 but I'll keep thinking about it.
Either's fine.
(view in fixed font)
U1 U2 ... U11 .-------. .-------. .-------.
+12v >--|gnd Vdd|--|gnd Vdd|-...-|gnd Vdd|--> +5v '-------' '-------' '-------'U1-U11 = 555 or PIC.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
, 8...
That isn't 3 voltages per chip as the OP asked for. It also doesn't really regulate.
I have made a booster regulator with the LM555 that worked just fine. I have figured out the design for a bucker that looks like it would work but so far without adding a lot of external parts I haven't come up with a way to regulate more than one voltage.
Lots of external parts, schottkies and inductors.
We already stock the LTC3407, 3411, and 3412, all similar. But it would be great if somebody did a minimal-parts, minimal-size triple synchronous switcher, ideally with internal inductors. I *told* LTC to do this, and, incredibly, they haven't got around to it. It's not as if FPGAs are losing popularity.
The Spartan 6 parts will run from two supplies (Vccint can run from
3.3) but we want to use a DDR dram, at 1.8 volts, so we're back up to three.To keep the inductor and cap sizes down, you've got to switch at a MHz or two.
John
...
something like a ISL65426 and an ldo?
-Lasse
John asked for a switcher with 3 regulated outputs, to save space. You wanted a 555 or a PIC. So, like our health care bill, I blended the two sets of requirements and came up with a solution that costs more, uses more parts & space, doesn't regulate, but does use either a
555 or a PIC.That's called compromise.
The classic way is a flyback with multiple secondaries, close the loop on the main voltage, LDOs on the others.
But of course we all knew that.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
The LTM4615 has all that inside, including the inductors and LDO. That may be the most compact solution, for $24.
Still no magic bullet.
John
On a sunny day (Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:09:30 -0800) it happened John Larkin wrote in :
Voltages and how many change all the time, better have separate switchers, Havin ga 3 in 1 would reduce the market by a factor 9 :-)
You make small series with high profits. No reason not to use 3 switchers.
The LTC switcher voltages are usually programmed with one or two resistors per output. An SPI interface to a nonvolatile memory would be even better.
We're space constrained by the fixed size of a VME module. The current project is a 16 channel differential-input digitizer with BIST and a
32-bit interface (requiring two DIN connectors and lots of buffers to the backplane.) It's very tight, and the more features we include the more we can sell. Wasting 2 or 3 square inches on voltage regs is silly.We commonly build products with 8 or 9 separate power rails, with the power regulators over a third of the board area. This is getting silly. SIPs would be useful, to use available height instead of valuable board surface area. The thermals might be better, too.
John
That LTM4615 looks pretty stinkin' nice--I can think of cheaper ways, and smaller ways, but not cheaper, simpler and smaller ways.
I have some Power Trends modules, older models that drop into 78xx slots. Cute. I wonder if they've expanded their line...
James Arthur
traco has some 1A SIP modules ,
-Lasse
On a sunny day (Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:08:59 -0800) it happened John Larkin wrote in :
Can you not make small vertical boards with each a switcher? The disadvantage of vertical is that it is more sensitive to mechanical vibration causing bad contacts or broken solder joints.
TI bought Power Trends (in 1999!) and, yes, they have expanded the line since then.
ince
Hmmm, no luck. I went to the TI pages to look for power supplies, but all they had were power management solutions.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
Joel prodded me to scout TI nee PowerTrends. They have a bunch of single-output 5-SIP modules that take about the real estate of a TO-220.
PTR08060 -- 4.5-14Vin, 0.6
We looked at the TI stuff a while back. The external cap requirement is bad, as is the height. They run at 300 KHz!
John
in
ldules
That last one's 15x13x9mm, no output cap needed. The 1st one needs
100uF.James
...
Yes so you need a really fast PIC or 555
The ADC on the PIC isn't fast enough to do cycle by cycle voltage checking so you would have to close the servo loop at way less than Nyquist. Unfortunately this would also make the filter capacitors big.
I think you actually could do it with an AVR--their PWMs have ~40nS resolution.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required