Why is it that the manufacturers' footprints for SM devices nearly always give the dimensions between the edges of the pads? I thought it was standard engineering practice to give the dimensions between centres, which is what is required by the PCB package I use, so I have to do a few calculations every time I create a new SM footprint.
Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
Further to the above, I've just seen a footprint which has *one* dimension between the *centre* of a central pad and the edge of another with *all* the others between the edges!!!
I always try to print it out 1:1 and lay the part overtop with a new footprint. If there's no samples in hand, that's when problems (this and other kinds) tend to occur.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Using my CAD software, when creating Patterns like this - I will usually also place the Package Outline information on an Assembly Layer - superimposing it onto the Pad Layout. I will also create little square pads on the Assembly Layer - that way... if something looks 'odd' it will usually jump out at me, and I can investigate further, correcting if necessary.
I had a Pattern recently - for a SIM Card - that dimensioned to the plastic edges... and the Pad edges. That was a challenge. I think mechanicers like to pose interesting challenges when it comes to dimensioning parts.
Hello, everybody. In my opinion it is worth to visit
formatting link
and try their PCB Libraries Navigator. It is free (demo) for a month period. It helps to design land patterns properly concerning all tolerancies. I would appreciate any opinions about it. Best Regards. Slav.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.