Cockies in the cable

Cockatoos suspected of breaking Telstra fibre

Cockie wanna cable?

Telstra has fingered prolific numbers of cockatoos as the potential culprits behind damage to a temporary fibre cable put in place after floods in the Kimberley region last month.

ABC Rural News first reported that animals had contributed to internet and phone outages in the region by 'munching' on the telco's infrastructure.

The floods had earlier caused a major backhaul link to break in a remote area on the Fitzroy River, causing problems for residents north of Broome and in the Kimberley, according to Telstra area manager Tony Carmichael.

Carmichael said Telstra had diverted some internet traffic onto diverse paths and also run a temporary cable above ground to add capacity on the route.

However, the temporary cable also suffered a break when animals ? thought to be cockatoos ? managed to penetrate the sheathing and access the glass fibres.

"There's definitely evidence of animals causing some damage," Carmichael told iTnews.

"Looking at the cable we believed the damage was caused by cockatoos - simply because there were a lot of marks along the sheath length, which I guess is typical of a cockatoo going up and down the length of the cable."

Full Story:

formatting link

More at:

formatting link

Cheers Don...

==================

--
Don McKenzie

Dontronics Blog:     http://www.GodzillaSeaMonkey.com
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

At the old deep space station at Woomera, we had to put covers on the cable trays on the 85' dish. It was the only way to stop the cockies from eating the cables, we tried everything else including shooting a few and hanging the bodies from the dish, but nothing worked other than the covers. NASA sent out some expensive expanded polystyrene covers for some of the smaller dishes, the cockies ate those in less than an hour.

At the Carnarvon tracking station, we had some large HF horizontally polarised yagis. the cockies used to land on the elements and bounce until they broke. We tried painting them black so that they got really hot in the sun, and painting some sticky goo on them that was supposed to discourage birds, but the only solution in the end was to lower the antennas to the ground when not in use ie. outside of a mission.

Cockies would have to be one of the most destructive wildlife in this country.

Reply to
keithr

:At the old deep space station at Woomera, we had to put covers on the :cable trays on the 85' dish. It was the only way to stop the cockies :from eating the cables, we tried everything else including shooting a :few and hanging the bodies from the dish, but nothing worked other than :the covers. NASA sent out some expensive expanded polystyrene covers for :some of the smaller dishes, the cockies ate those in less than an hour. : :At the Carnarvon tracking station, we had some large HF horizontally :polarised yagis. the cockies used to land on the elements and bounce :until they broke. We tried painting them black so that they got really :hot in the sun, and painting some sticky goo on them that was supposed :to discourage birds, but the only solution in the end was to lower the :antennas to the ground when not in use ie. outside of a mission. : :Cockies would have to be one of the most destructive wildlife in this :country.

Except perhaps, Camels.

A mate of mine who participates in culls of wild pigs, ferral dogs and cats, donkeys and camels in outback WA told me the other day that one station owner where he shoots had to a repair bill quote around $700K for fences damaged by camels - there are millions of the buggers out there.. He can't afford it in the current environment so the fences will have to stay down. They just rest their rumps agains the fence and rock back and forth until it leans over. There would doubtless be other station owners in a similar position.

Cockies (generic term for galahs, corellas and other large cokatoos) have always been a damaging species for Telecom. It wasn't so bad when the network relied upon aerial pole routes and copper/galvanised wire links but as soon as plastics and other similar synthetics were included in the external plant the cockies discovered they were a nice way of getting beak exercise. They have made a mess of the Hills clothes hoist line in my back yard as well....

Reply to
Ross Herbert

behind damage to a temporary fibre cable

(snip)

This has been a known issue in cocky areas as long as insulated or sheathed cables have been exposed above ground. Coax or power cables, all get the treatment.

Only goes to show that Telstra continue to employ people without a clue. Onya, Telstra!

Reply to
who where

We mount Yagis on rotators on car rooftops and use them for radio direction finding ("foxhunts") including on forest tracks and up to pretty high speeds. The most reliable way I've seen is to use a flexible joint at the base of each element, which takes a certain force to bend but then goes floppy. If you did this such that it simply drops to vertical before it gets to its breaking point, the cockies would fall off and soon give up sitting on it. I reckon that would be a good solution for the longer elements on VHF TV antennas too, except with digital TV those aren't really necessary any more.

Did you have to have horizontal polarisation? Because a quad would otherwise be a good option.

Reply to
Clifford Heath

Thanks for the advice, but I was talking of the far past (Gemini missions), and we had to make do what NASA supplied.

Reply to
keithr

So, what did you want them to do instead, wait until they had a crew to put it underground before trying to get the Customer's back with a service? I'd be willing to bet that if it was your service off the air that you would want it back ASAP.

Seems to me that it's you without a clue.

Actually, Telstra/PMG/AOTC/Telecom Aust used to have its own research labs a long time ago where this type of thing was trialled and had input to Manufacturers to overcome problems, if possible. In earlier days a lot of equipment was modified to suit local conditions and requirements. Trouble was that with competition you can't spend that time and money when your competitor just buys an item off the shelf. Probably wouldn't have been any difference which telco did the work as cockies just don't discriminate between Companies.

Hate Telstra if you wish, but do it for the right reasons.

PhilD

Reply to
PhilD

Telstra (well Telecom...) is also responsible for the training of a hell of a lot of technical guys over the years as well.

Reply to
Dennis

PMG, 68

Reply to
PhilD

lot of technical guys over the years as

PMG, Class of 59, with 500+ training each year around that time. Worked with 3 of them from the class of 59 in a later life for 25 years, and still have contact with them today.

formatting link

Cheers Don...

====================

--
Don McKenzie

Dontronics Blog:     http://www.GodzillaSeaMonkey.com
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

...

Which part of the curriculum covered the Cocky Cable snatching phenomenon?

Reply to
B J Foster

:On 15-Apr-11 12:53 AM, PhilD wrote: :>

Class of 56 Perth....

Like yourself Don, we maintain contact and have an annual dinner for our intake. This year (about 3 weeks ago in fact) we had some 60 odd attendees. One of our number who attended has been based at ABC studios in Sydney for many years, and despite being in his 70's, is still working under contract for the ABC to do the technical stuff for Macca on Sunday.

Another group of ex-techs who worked in Pier Exchange hold regular bi-monthly lunches where we discuss and solve the problems of the world. There are many other groups of ex PMG/Telecom/Telstra/DCA/ABC techs around the country who hold regular get togethers.

As far as Telecom actually training technical staff - that all finished many years ago in the mid 90's. It is a fact that a number of private companies over the years took advantage of this "free" source of technically trained people and "bribed" them to move away from Telecom for a few pieces of silver. I doubt there would be more than a few of those trained techs still with the organisation and those who do, are old and grey like me. I often wonder how an organisation as big as Telstra can survive these days with a supposed technical workforce which only knows how to drive a computer. Network knowledge is a thing of the past and actually working in the field on equipment is largely left to private contractors. I visited Wellington Exchange (17 equipment floors) a few years back and it was virtually empty of people and all floors were blacked out. Up until the mid 90's it was a hive of activity with more than a hundred tech staff working there. Building infrastructure maintenance is performed by a private contractor who is housed on the 15th floor.

Reply to
Ross Herbert

of

intake.

the

That's a nice story, and one that I doubt will be repeated greatly in future generations. I dare say on evidence, you would have to be in your early 70s also Ross.

We got a small intake from WA in 1959, and I had a list of those names 12 years ago, but I doubt that I can find them today.

We had a 40 year reunion in Victoria in 1999, and I was expecting a 50 year one in 2009, but it didn't happen. As I know of several people that have passed away in the group since then, I guess the key organizers may have been part of that group.

So we just end up with a handful of a few old PMG work friends we still know, getting together from time to time.

Only problem with old age is ....... sorry, what was I saying?

Cheers Don...

========================

--
Don McKenzie

Dontronics Blog:     http://www.GodzillaSeaMonkey.com
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

If they knew that it would be prone to cocky attack - and that's my point - then a temporary cable should be just that. If they don't have CP (cocky-proof) stuff in their armoury, then expect the temporary fix to be attacked and get on with a proper fix. What's the betting in today's understaffed outfit (supplemented by contractors) some shiny-bum said "that's back on the air, now let's focus on other things" rather than addressing the vulnerability of their temp fix?

Whatever you reckon. Just because half the over-50 technically-inclined in this country did a stint at TTS doesn't give you a monopoly on the right to express a view.

Telecom and predecessors were the biggest sheltered monopoly this country is ever likely to see. Competition? Pfffft!

I do, and mostly for the right reasons.

Reply to
who where

When you have a major event, there is always more than enough work to keep everyone busy for along time afterwards and replacement of temporary fixes is most efficently left to routine maitenance.

Reply to
terryc

You're probably right, they probably did say that and it was probably about getting the other Customers and links back up and running. Or it might have been that after a long period away from home doing urgent repairs in conditions that wankers like you would never desire to experience they went back home for a break. At times that home is up to a 1000 km or more away via roads that may still be flooded or severely damaged in which case they probably flew in by chopper and could only take in limited equipment for the repair.

It still seems to me that it's you without a clue of what it take to operate in remote locations and conditions like that.

Maybe, but at least it does give me and insight from actually having been there, done that rather than some armchair critic who doesn't seem to have a clue. BTW, what is your experience?

Don't know where you get that from, but where I was and experienced country and metro installation and maintenance you couldn't get a more dedicated crew to getting what had to be done back then to provide and maintain Aust wide upgrades from manual operation right up to the modern electronic exchanges. I doubt that you have any knowledge of what it took in manpower and equipment to achieve what you take for granted today. If you have any problem with all that take it up with the Politicians (both sides) not the hands and feet people who spent years of their life doing it in probably places you wouldn't consider visiting on a holiday let alone live there for extended periods. Yes we/they were paid to do it, but not necessarily enough to put up with some conditions and enjoy it. Appreciation for what was being done mostly came from people in the Country, not wankers like you who complain about the littlest thing.

As for your comment about "competition" as far as I and many others were concerned, people bitched about Telstra/PMG/AOTC/Telecom Aust and wanted competition without any understanding of what that would ultimately mean. Well, you got your competitors and you got your interfering from Politicians and if you don't like what you got from that then blame yourselves for not knowing what you should have pressured for. Billions have been wasted on duplication of cable services and mobiles, Telstra privatised, and now more billions wasted on setting up a new monopoly in the NBN. A new monopoly BTW that is from the same Labor that at least where I was started the rot of outsourcing. From a Labor BTW that campaigned that they were going to protect us.

What, your mobile momentarily went off air somewhere and you had to go to the trouble of hitting redial, or can't understand why you can't drive across the whole of Aust while still on a call?

Grow up, do you think that subscribers of other Telco's don't have issues with theirs as well. They can all give crap service at times. I have issues with some Managers too that I used to be under but I don't bad mouth the whole Company because of it.

PhilD

Reply to
PhilD

I've spent enough time doing maintenance work in places like Derby and Kununurra to know what it takes, thanks for asking.

You're the one who raised the topic of competition. And they didn't have any back then.

Nothing to do with mobiles. Apart from a corporate Motorola analog I've never had the "pleasure" of using Telstra's mobile network.

But I *do* have a long experience of their landline services, both POTS and leased lines.

I'm sure.

But back on topic, why the cocky attack was not anticipated screams inexperience (or worse, a couldn't care less attitude). And if it was anticipated, the inference is less friendly.

Reply to
who where

:On 15-Apr-11 11:07 AM, Ross Herbert wrote: :> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:09:47 +1000, Don McKenzie wrote: :>

:> :On 15-Apr-11 12:53 AM, PhilD wrote: :> :>

:>

:> Class of 56 Perth.... :>

:> Like yourself Don, we maintain contact and have an annual dinner for our intake. :> This year (about 3 weeks ago in fact) we had some 60 odd attendees. One of our :> number who attended has been based at ABC studios in Sydney for many years, and :> despite being in his 70's, is still working under contract for the ABC to do the :> technical stuff for Macca on Sunday. : :That's a nice story, and one that I doubt will be repeated greatly in future generations. :I dare say on evidence, you would have to be in your early 70s also Ross. : :We got a small intake from WA in 1959, and I had a list of those names 12 years ago, but I doubt that I can find them today. : :We had a 40 year reunion in Victoria in 1999, and I was expecting a 50 year one in 2009, but it didn't happen. As I know :of several people that have passed away in the group since then, I guess the key organizers may have been part of that :group. : :So we just end up with a handful of a few old PMG work friends we still know, getting together from time to time. : :Only problem with old age is ....... sorry, what was I saying? : :Cheers Don... : :========================

The oldest group I know of in Perth is the 1952 intake fo TIT's and they have an annual lunch at a popular watering hole in the CBD. Their numbers are dwindling so they also invite other intakes as well as instructors and engineers who made it from being TIT, to participate in their function. It is usually well attended and we even have a 93 year old ex-instructor Vic Beacham who comes up from Bunbury. Actually someone drives down to Bunbury to pick him up and take him back again and that's a 320km round trip. Old Vic is an environmentalist and still stands in the protests about logging native forests....

Reply to
Ross Herbert

"who where" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

I re-read the original stories and for someone claiming to have worked up in that area you display an ignorance of what is required to do a permanent repair, let alone in remote locations. How do you expect them to get heavy cable ploughing & trenching equipment in to an area still subject to flooding until the end of the Wet Season? The choice will come down to doing an immediate temporary patch up or waiting weeks to get to do something more permanent, but I doubt that Customers off the air will tolerate that. If this was a major trunk connection it has to be attended to very urgently, even in a temporary manner. Of course repairs are going to be temporary and I'm sure that there are plenty of similar urgent repairs that have happened in QLD/NSW/Vic with this seasons floods everywhere. Not all replacements can happen immediately when for example you have bridges destroyed that were themselves being used as crossing points for some services. There are things like manpower and equipment limitations to get all jobs done to your satisfaction immediately. For that blame Politicians, not the people on the front line who are mostly the people on the receiving end of the bitching from whingers like you who think that only they are the priority. You could of course go to an alternative supplier and ask them to provide services in those areas, but don't hold your breath as they will only go where they can make a good profit, not because of social responsibility to cover the whole of Australia.

From all the staff I worked with who were involved in restoration work in remote areas I only ever saw dedication to getting Customers back on line as quickly as possible while having to put up with very trying work conditions, long hours and long distance travel, and of course the odd whinger like you. They deserve better support from above and definitely better from the likes of you.

PhilD

Reply to
PhilD

who where wrote

want it back ASAP.

back then.

Or that that temporary fix was better than nothing when they had no cockatoo proof alternative available.

Nope. Not if there was no alternative readily available for a temporary fix.

Reply to
Rod Speed

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.