I don't know why you're giving me a lecture on basic physics. As I said, the issue I see does not relate to efficiency, but reliability. It doesn't matter what its ratings are, or how efficient it is - the higher the power you run through it, the hotter it will run. Hotter usually means less reliable.
Someone gives you a statement based on fact and you reply with a statement based on a generalisation. If you're going to be critical you should at least put some factual data behind your argument.
If you set the angle to peak winter output (latitude + 22.5), you will get a 45 degree off axis angle in mid summer. That will reduce your summer output to cos(45) = 0.71 of peak ( assuming cosine law holds ). But if you set say 20 degrees higher than that ( ie a few degrees lower than latitude), you will get an off peak of cos(20) in winter, and cos(45-20) in summer, which is a much better compromise. Other values are possible, depending on exactly what you think the winter/summer sun ratio is, of course the cloud cover effects come into this too.
--
Regards,
Adrian Jansen adrianjansen at internode dot on dot net
Design Engineer J & K Micro Systems
Microcomputer solutions for industrial control
Note reply address is invalid, convert address above to machine form.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.