I guess I have not reached the breakdown voltage and I need a power supply with more voltage.
However, I wonder, what the definition of breakdown voltage is. Usually you see the sharp increase in current at Vbd in the diode characteristic curve. But isn't this a matter of zoom? When I use nA instead of mA on the current axis the curve will look similar with the breakdown (forward) voltage shifted towards 0. IMHO the curve will look exactly the same if it's a purely exponential curve and you zoom in or out.
Or is there a voltage below which no impact ionization occurs and this can be seen as lowest possible definition of Vbd? But I rather think there is always a chance for a free electron to gain enough energy to knock free another electron. It'll just never make an avalance through the whole barrier below a certain voltage. OTOH if a single electron travels through the barrier due to a low voltage and at the other side it happens to get bounced around by the lattice atoms to enough energy to kick free a second electron that's an avalanche that made it through the whole barrier. So at any voltage there'll be avalanches and avalanche current will increase (exponentially, I guess) over the whole voltage range.
Then there's zener breakdown which I think is some kind of tunneling.
Oh no didn't you lose credit in school for too many digits! :^)
I stuck a red LED backwards with a 100k ohm resistor is series... at about 24V I got all these 'beautiful' RC spikes. ~ 1 volt peak, rc time ~20us. Cranking up the voltage more and it was noise everywhere, on a DC background. (I was monitoring the voltage across the resistor.)
Yeah I did, When you biased it right to the breakdown region you could definitely see the effect of sticking an light up to it. Try it. Everyone's got a red 5mm LED, 100k ohm and ~30V power supply.
Oh, I've already done this not to long ago when I was pondering on an idea.
How ever, I am trying to see where you are getting the noise from? When I did it, all I saw on the scope was a PV effect at 1 uA, it could've been more, been a while.
I used my over head light which is nothing more than a incandescent
52 watt. I did see the 120 hz in the signal, too, when getting the exposure to where I was getting 50% forward biasing voltage for that LED.
But I was able to get over 1 V as a PV with out any biasing, just the LED on the leads. It would make for a nice photo detector in a pinch though if you have the hi-z circuit for it.
I guess if one was to have a few LED's in series with HV applied and wait for a few photons to stop by for visit it would then act as a photo multiplier and push things a long, thus giving you a very sensitive detector. Or at least I think it would :)
I'll have to set that experiment up again at work, this time using the Lecroy maybe and see if I can see anything I may have missed before.
Hmm, the DMM showed the full input voltage. No voltage drop due to the LED. IIRC before that I tried the LED in forward direction and got some voltage drop. However, after trying the reverse direction the behaviour was the same in either direction. No light, except for a short flash when I closed the circuit. The DMM showed ca. 330 mV diode drop and 445 Ohm resistance, both in each direction. I was convinced the LED was dead, but when hooked up normally it was still shining without appearant loss in brightness.
Ohh, I also had a 10uF film capacitor across the input voltage.
The currents he is seeing are in the range of possible photodiode operation.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
Cool. I wonder if you're approaching some sort of single-photon avalanche/Geiger mode. The dark behavior looks like a typical small zener diode at low current, a really noisy sawtooth oscillation.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
Yeah the low current looks pretty much like a ~20V zener biased to the corner. Where I assume it's the whole diode capacitance discharging..
Here I've got 100k ohm and ~10-20 us TC so 100- 200pF. That seems like a lot for a little LED. .. ohh.. I just had some coax with 'grabber clips'... ~170pF...
A x10 probe tomorrow.
Hey for those digital type guys, you could stick a comparator on the output and count pulses. As you keep increasing the voltage you hit a quiet region, where it looks resistive.
Well I've only looked at one red LED. (I hope it's not a golden part.)
--
The currents he reported, I suspect, were measured under a single - or
not widely variable level of illumination - so it's likely that the
changes in current were due to the changes in reverse voltage across
the diode and not due to changes in illumination.
HEY! I think I may be counting single photons! (At extremely low efficiency) This is amazing. (So just try it yourself.)
A variable power supply reverse biased red LED in 5mm package (Vr~24 volts). 100 kohm current limiting (and sense) resistor, look at current through the 100k ohm with a x10 scope probe. Adjust voltage till you see some RC spikes. Now cover the LED with something black. The pulses stop! I turned out the lights in my lab and can still 'see' the light that's coming in from the room next door. I need a bit of buffering so I can send the pulses into a counter.
The count rate is highly dependent on the bias level.
24 V no counts (at 200mV threshold)
24.5 V 500 counts/sec in room light
25 V 4.5k counts/ s in same light.
25.5 V 19kk/sec.
Total Friday Fun! (I've gotta put some final changes into a pcb too.)
I should hit up google 'cause it seems like someone must have done this before.
You may be in possession of a Geiger mode photon detector at about
1/1000 the regular price. But expect a high rate of dark counts.
I wonder how you could demonstrate single photon counting. Probably put the detector in a box with an LED and a lot of optical attenuation, and drive the LED on/off, and measure something.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
That _is_ fun. Do you have enough ND filters lying around that you can make a 1 photon per millisecond per die area light source for it? You can figure out the threshold number of photons by looking at how the count rate goes up with light level-- a few ND1 filters in a row would allow a simple measurement of that.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
So the RBLED is a lot more sensitive to the yellow light. (as you would expect.) The count rate is at least roughly linear with the light intensity. (I think that means it can't be some weird two photon process that gives the pulses.) At the highest count rates for the yellow LED I was getting some overlapped pulses on the scope... those might not have been counted. So the apparent fall off in sensitivity for the high light intensity yellow LED is expected. I've got a piece of coax with clip leads connecting it to a little amp and the pulse width is still about 10-20 us. I need a little one or two transistor buffer to hang on it.
The photon generated count rate is a strong function of the bias voltage. All the above data was taken with Vb=3D 24.3V. This gives counts in the room light of ~450 per sec. At 24.9 V the room light count rate is 4800. (And this is still all photon generated, I can trun off the lights and cover it with black plastic and get zero counts per second.
I'm not sure if I answered your threshold question or not Phil.
Well I tried another brand of red LED. (Avago HLMP-EG30-NR000)
635nm. And this showed none of the pulsing avalanche breakdown behaviour.
The LEDs we purchased were from Newark part number 92N5331. No longer carried. :^(
So I don't know if these are 'special' in some way. I tried three of them from the drawer and all avalanched at ~24 volts.
I've got a few other different color LEDS that I'll try.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.