Most I ever saw will proudly declare that they are true RMS reading meters if that is indeed what they are as it commands a higher selling price point for the 'instrument'.
Yours will give the RMS reading of 120 Volts even if it is a " cheapy". Because you are reading AC power, which is supposed to be a purely sinsoidal waveform.
A true RMS meter constantly calculates the voltage by examining the waveform of the signal under test. Pure sine wave is easy. Complex waveforms are not so easy and a regular averaging meter will mis-report the value read.
If you are only reading basic AC power voltage, you do not need a true RMS voltmeter.
Having established that it reads a sine wave correctly, set it to AC and feed it +/5V square wave (10V peak to peak), if RMS it will read 5V, if average responding it'll read high.
--
This email has not been checked by half-arsed antivirus software
Check the other thread you started for a way to test it and be sure.
But it really is a feature so it would say so. think how hard it is to buil d it digital, well not that bad. Old analog true RMS meters actually used a n incandescent based optocoupler. In digital it must sample and analyse the waveform. Pain in the ass, I wouldn't want to try it.
waveforms are not so easy and a regular averaging meter will mis-report the value read. "
Came in handy when we were wrapping extra windings on a flyback transformer to boos the CRT filament voltage like a brightener, or to isolate it if it had a K-G2 short. I was the guy to do that, nobodyu else could grasp it. I even re-equalized the video so that if it intermittently shorted it would not cause a smear. that's why I got the big bucks. the fact that it is usel ess knowledge now is why I no longer get the big bucks.
By the way, in this guy's post over in basics I got a way to figure out if it is true RMS. Do you happen to know an easier way ? That is assuming you have no access to manufacturer's information. They don't all say right on t he meter, I am pretty sure my Fluke doesn't.
(I want my buddy's 8842 IIRC the model correctly, mine is only an 8050a)
** The 10:1 stepped input attenuator is not frequency compensated ( like a scope input ) for flat response. Only expensive bench models routinely have that. So frequency response is good to a few kHz at best.
With a "true RMS" meter, measurement bandwidth, level dependency and "crest factor" are crucial specs that vary widely.
** FFS - that prick's $10 POS is NOT "true RMS".
** Wot - no Google?
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.